It doesn’t. He thinks a tmag breaker and AFCI are the same and affords the same level of protection even though they trip on completely different principles.
Except those exact claims are made by UL:
Which was further vindicated by the CMPs when 210.12 A 4 was voted affirmative.
He’s ignoring how the world works to push his point of view. He’s convinced everyone has it wrong except him. You won’t get anything useful out of that kind of mindset.
If one chooses to ignore three decades of manufacturers, CMP members, NEMA, IEC, CPSC, UL, and other major players discussing the magnetic pickup of circuit breakers in relation to arc mitigation to the point magnetic pickup of all single pole breakers was lowered from by a factor of 20.
When it was realized that lowering this threshold to 75 amps would result in nuisance tripping only then was an electronic solution created, instead of a simpler solution discussed of adding a table to the code restricting how far #14, #12 and #10 could be run.