RHJohnson said:Sending above thread to Arizona Department Of Labor, Electrical Division.
The only problem I have is why they find it acceptable?
If you were to wind up in a law suit it can be argued that it is not code compliant.
220/221 said:The only problem I have is, why does the NEC find it unacceptable?
Simple safe and efficient.
Who wants their panel outside on the patio anyway?
220/221 said:How safe is running exposed SE service cable???
That's what you'd call empirical evidence that a particular way of doing something is safe.
You are going to go back and make sure those wires go straight into the breakers and busbars aren't you?220/221 said:You don't hide a work of art like this in a musty basement !
![]()
Nice upgrade BTW. What prompted the call, failure or more stuff?220/221 said:BTW, all that stuff was CRAMMED into a twinned up panel before.
220/221 said:The electrons in AZ prefer a smooth even flow around a nice radius. It cuts down on the monthly bills as much as 12%.
c2500 said:So, with all that has been said.....is anyone in an area wher you are required to abide by the manufacturer's rating for NM connectors ?
service conductors look short...220/221 said:The electrons in AZ prefer a smooth even flow around a nice radius. It cuts down on the monthly bills as much as 12%.
BTW, all that stuff was CRAMMED into a twinned up panel before.
![]()