Power factor

Status
Not open for further replies.

Besoeker

Senior Member
Location
UK
Well I ain't from 'round there so...

Are you implying that the Scots can't all agree on the pronunciation?
Not really although regional accents abound. An Aberdonian and a Glaswegian don't sound at all alike.
The difference between Chic Murray and say Billy Connoly is very marked.

But lest we stray off topic too far and invoke moderaters' intervention........
Distortion power factor is a real issue these days.
The waveform measured on my incoming supply:

HomeVrev00_zpsf7551ef6.jpg


The flattened top tells the story.
 

jumper

Senior Member
It is not pronouced "lock ness monster"? How is it pronounced?

So proper is eck-lee-fetch-in? or eck-lee-feck-in? How does she say it?

Loch Ness Monster of course.............:)


Except that they don't have it right.

The internet of truth.:D

Well I ain't from 'round there so...

Are you implying that the Scots can't all agree on the pronunciation?

Punch drunk. humourous, and somewhat silly arguments abound...:)

Y'all train drivers amuse me and provide a somewhat pleasant diversion....

Hint: Neither Scots nor Americans speak English actually.:D
 

peter d

Senior Member
Location
New England
Awesome incite, thank :):cool:

But how does on go about net power factor? Consider an HID lamp with a reactive ballast. Its essentially a resistor in series with a reactor, yet the power factor can vary all over the place.

I'm getting in on this late and didn't read all 19 pages, but an HID arc is not purely resistive, the current waveform of the arc is highly non-linear.
 

jumper

Senior Member
I think you wil find that Robert Louis Balfour Stevenson made a pretty good fist of it.
Samuel Clemens too.

Bes, it was a riddle. To continue it, such as:

What is common or not between British and Americans?

Hint 2 :For the above statement see Oscar Wilde, Bernard Shaw, and Winston Churchill.

P.S. Both authors you cite are outstanding IMHO.:thumbsup:
 

mbrooke

Batteries Included
Location
United States
Occupation
Technician
I want to keep this thread on track, politely saying :) And yes the British and Americans are different in different ways.


Anyhow, why is it that ballasts are parallel X and C circuits and not series circuits?
 

GoldDigger

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Placerville, CA, USA
Occupation
Retired PV System Designer
I want to keep this thread on track, politely saying :) And yes the British and Americans are different in different ways.


Anyhow, why is it that ballasts are parallel X and C circuits and not series circuits?

As you vary X and C to get close to unity power factor the series impedance approaches zero, which is not much help in limiting the current through the lamp. :)
 

mbrooke

Batteries Included
Location
United States
Occupation
Technician
As you vary X and C to get close to unity power factor the series impedance approaches zero, which is not much help in limiting the current through the lamp. :)



Perhaps... If you take say a 5 milli henry inconductor and a 4uF capacitor, would these small components really behave like a solid piece of #12 when driver a 400 watt Metal Halide?
 
Last edited:

mbrooke

Batteries Included
Location
United States
Occupation
Technician
As you vary X and C to get close to unity power factor the series impedance approaches zero, which is not much help in limiting the current through the lamp. :)

Here is what I have in mind (second picture in)


http://www.candlepowerforums.com/vb/showthread.php?260956-Fluorescent-to-LED-night-light-conversion


The ballast in this case us an capacitor and inductor in between the line. Perhaps not unit PF, but close. Yet even though its said this circuit would not provide impedance it still does somehow. It is this series circuit which puzzles me. The parallel aspect I understand from the equations posts (awesome help btw) :cool: :)
 

Besoeker

Senior Member
Location
UK
You can calculate the impedances as shown but you can't add them up arithmetically - as simple numbers.

If you look down the page a bit you will see calculations for ZR, ZL, and ZC.
You will note that impedances are expressed as two components.
If you take ZL, and ZC you will not that they have opposite signs, one positive, one negative. They subtract.

Do that and you end up with two components, R and X. But note the 90deg difference. You can't simply add them.
Imagine two sides of a triangle with a 90 deg angle between them. A shape like a corner if you like. Join the outer sides to get the diagonal. That diagonal represents the total impedance.

Obviously, it is longer than the two component parts. But not simply the arithmenic sum. You need to use pythagorous.
 

GoldDigger

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Placerville, CA, USA
Occupation
Retired PV System Designer
Here is what I have in mind (second picture in)


http://www.candlepowerforums.com/vb/showthread.php?260956-Fluorescent-to-LED-night-light-conversion


The ballast in this case us an capacitor and inductor in between the line. Perhaps not unit PF, but close. Yet even though its said this circuit would not provide impedance it still does somehow. It is this series circuit which puzzles me. The parallel aspect I understand from the equations posts (awesome help btw) :cool: :)
I do not see an inductor anywhere in the schematic. Nor in the picture.
Using a series capacitor to limit current is common for small loads and it does not provide anywhere near unity PF.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top