hardworkingstiff
Senior Member
- Location
- Wilmington, NC
That is why it is prohibited in a manufactured home.
Wouldn't that also be the reason it (branch circuit) is required to originate in the service panel in order to use the exception?
That is why it is prohibited in a manufactured home.
Same thing can happen anywhere else, I don't think it is the only reason why not allowed in a manufactured or mobile home.That is why it is prohibited in a manufactured home.
Same thing can happen anywhere else, I don't think it is the only reason why not allowed in a manufactured or mobile home.
In a manufactured home (mobile is not PC now) you bond the frame. they do not want the frame energized.
Well, after all the additional information that's come out, I must admit to being a little baffled. What's the issue here? There's an existing 3-wire dryer receptacle. The dryer Manufacturer's instructions show how to connect it using a 3-wire cord. Install a 3-wire cord per the Manufacturer's instructions, plug it in, and you're done. NEC doesn't care how the dryer is wired internally -- that's an issue for UL (and it apparently passed UL's testing).
Now, it might not be a bad idea for the OP to point out to the owner that the existing receptacle is not code-compliant, and see if he's willing to pay for an upgrade (if for no other reason, just to cover himself liability-wise). But the Electrician certainly isn't responsible for bringing an existing condition he didn't touch into compliance with current code.
It is? Then what was all that talk about it not being allowed because it's not connected to the service panel? Or was that a side discussion that didn't deal with the OP's situation?The existing receptacle IS code compliant.
OP is an existing application.
IMHO the original installation may have considered this:
Service Equipment. The necessary equipment, usually consisting
of a circuit breaker(s) or switch(es) and fuse(s) and
their accessories, connected to the load end of service conductors
to a building or other structure, or an otherwise designated
area, and intended to constitute the main control and cutoff of
the supply.
Bet this is a condo or an apt.
It is? Then what was all that talk about it not being allowed because it's not connected to the service panel? Or was that a side discussion that didn't deal with the OP's situation?
Seems I have been disagreeing with you a lot lately, but I do agree with you here:blink:
This appliance is apparently intended to be connected to a 125/250 volt supply even though there is no neutral conductor necessary for operation. I have seen some ranges that are US design, that do not utilize a neutral, but still have same 3/4 wire 125/250 volt supply arrangements as most other ranges. I did about 30 apartments a few years back with all of them being that way, since they were new branch circuits they all had 14-50 configuration cords and receptacle installed and the neutral did nothing. But the neutral was still there if they ever changed to a range that needed a neutral. If I were OP I would connect the 10-30 plug and install the bonding jumper in the appliance, if not comfortable with that for some reason then install a 4 wire circuit and a 14-30 receptacle.
If I understand the OP correctly, the branch circuit originates from a sub panel and not the service equipment. If that is the case, I don't see how the exception listed above can be used to let the circuit stand as is. This is from a technical perspective.
Personally, I don't see it as a big deal, but that is just my opinion and doesn't count.
I do know that I recently relocated some switches in a commercial building and I used mc cable. I pulled 3-wire cable so a neutral would be in the switch box, and I asked the inspector if the job would have been turned down if I had used a 2-wire cable instead of the 3-wire. The answer was .
OP is an existing application.
IMHO the original installation may have considered this:
Service Equipment. The necessary equipment, usually consisting
of a circuit breaker(s) or switch(es) and fuse(s) and
their accessories, connected to the load end of service conductors
to a building or other structure, or an otherwise designated
area, and intended to constitute the main control and cutoff of
the supply.
Bet this is a condo or an apt.
From the wording of the code it is my understanding that as long as the neutral is insulated it this can originate from a sub panel. At least that's my interpretation.
I don't understand how you can interpret it that way. Seems like you meet all of the requirements EXCEPT the one that requires the branch circuit to originate in the service equipment.
I read it the same as mbrooke..... if all the following
conditions are met....
(3) The grounded conductor is insulated, or the grounded
conductor is uninsulated and part of a Type SE serviceentrance
cable and the branch circuit originates at the
service equipment.
(4) Grounding contacts of receptacles furnished as part of
the equipment are bonded to the equipment.
Serves me right for just going by others' comments. After actually reading the section, you're absolutely right. Seems this whole thread has been one big non-issue. But it's been a good learning experience (for me, anyway).I read it the same as mbrooke
From my take "or" lists 2 different scenarios, rather than applying it 2 both conditions. I have seen many apartments and some fast food equipment with this arrangement. Every other apartment I have seen is wired like this.
The condo in particular is part of a complex with 100 units all like this. All the stoves are wired in 6/3 without ground and all the dryers 10/3 without ground. The complex passed inspection and no other violations stand out.
Im not saying your wrong, but I doubt so many apartments in the US would all have this violation.
250.140 Frames of Ranges and Clothes Dryers. Frames
of electric ranges, wall-mounted ovens, counter-mounted
cooking units, clothes dryers, and outlet or junction boxes
that are part of the circuit for these appliances shall be
connected to the equipment grounding conductor in the
manner specified by 250.134 or 250.138.
Exception: For existing branch-circuit installations only
where an equipment grounding conductor is not present in
the outlet or junction box, the frames of electric ranges,
wall-mounted ovens, counter-mounted cooking units,
clothes dryers, and outlet or junction boxes that are part of
the circuit for these appliances shall be permitted to be
connected to the grounded circuit conductor if all the following
conditions are met.
(1) The supply circuit is 120/240-volt, single-phase, 3-wire;
or 208Y/120-volt derived from a 3-phase, 4-wire, wyeconnected
system.
(2) The grounded conductor is not smaller than 10 AWG
copper or 8 AWG aluminum.
(3) The grounded conductor is insulated, or the grounded
conductor is uninsulated and part of a Type SE serviceentrance
cable and the branch circuit originates at the
service equipment.
(4) Grounding contacts of receptacles furnished as part of
the equipment are bonded to the equipment.
Does it technically satisfy #1 if the supply circuit is straight 240-volt and not 120/240-volt?
But these rules are not limited to residential work, and would apply to ranges or clothes dryers if there were any wherever you have been working all those years, and they do exist outside of residential applications:happyyes:You made a good enough point that I dug up my 2011 handbook. The wording in the handbook seems to indicate that your posted interpretation is correct and mine is wrong. I stand corrected, and I thank you. :thumbsup:
I guess it's obvious that I've not done residential work in decades.
But these rules are not limited to residential work, and would apply to ranges or clothes dryers if there were any wherever you have been working all those years, and they do exist outside of residential applications:happyyes:
Since you are much better educated than I on the NEC said:I'm also interested in the answer to this one. Sometimes it seem the NEC is built to confuse.