haskindm said:
The guy doing the work "on the side" can only do it cheaper because the poor guy that he is working for is paying all of his overhead for him. Things like insurance, steady pay even when work is slow, social security, retirement, vacation, and workman's comp. Eliminate those, not to mention taxes, and everyone could charge much less.
So, if a journeyman electrician is raking leaves on the side, that's OK, but if he's installing hi hats in his neighbor's finished basement, it's not?
I can tell you quite frankly, that no contractor pays his employee's taxes, insurance, social security, retirement, vacation or worker's comp. All of that money comes from the sale of that man's labor and skills, which he sees relatively little of compared to what it's sold for.
In short, I pay for all those things AND I'm also paying the contractor's way! Along with his wifes, his family's, his secretary and his accountant and dispatcher, and on and on.
Doing side work is stealing from your employer and every other legitimate business just as much as if you took the materials off of his truck to do the work.
Doing side work is no more stealing from an employer than when a different contractor gets the work instead of you. What an employee of yours, or I, do when you're not paying me is none of your business or concern.
You can talk around it and justify it anyway you want, but the businessman is following the rules and the side-worker is not.
I've been around the block. I was born at night, but it wasn't last night. Businessmen do NOT EVER "follow the rules." Especially not contractors. You quote the rules when it suits you. When it doesn't, the rules might as well not exist.
Most people, when they start their own business, are shocked when they find out how much overhead is involved. My wife has a small business selling items on the Internet. She wanted to hire a neighbor to help her out a few hours per week. When she found out how much money and paperwork was involved (tax withholding, Workman's comp, social security) she found that it was going to cause more work that having the employee could save.
Your example is irrelevant. I have no idea what internet business your wife is in, but there are many thriving internet business' If your wife's profit doesn't justify the overhead of paying an employee, then she must not even be treating herself as an employee - meaning... SHE is doing SIDE WORK ON THE INTERNET while you're covering her overhead, taxes, rent, social security, etc...
But it's ok for you & your family to break the very rules you want everyone else to follow, right?
If you want to do a job for a friend or relative, do your boss a favor and run it through them. You can donate the labor, but let your boss charge something to help with his overhead, and cover you with his insurance. You, your boss, and the customer will all be better off. You may not like the rules (laws) but that does not make them go away.
If I do a job for a friend or relative, it's likely for free. (They'll buy the material.) For any other bona-fide side job, I will not run it by my boss, he's about 100,000 stockholders or more. The work I'd do is work neither my company nor any other I've worked for would even consider touching. So the only contractor I'm "hurting" is the kind that would never employ me - and most probably one that isn't paying anyone's retirement, social security, worker's comp, taxes, vacations, or benefits. And that's fine by me.