Single Phase vs Three Phase flow of electrons with no neutral/grounded path?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rick Christopherson

Senior Member
I've only been reading this thread piece-meal as new postings have been made, but it appears there may still be some confusion with the topic. I think this might be due to some terminology and how we sometimes visualize systems.

The first thing I noticed is that maybe some people are getting hung up on the term "phase shift" or "phase angle". In this particular situation, it might be better to realize that a "phase shift" is simply a "time delay". We call it an angle because we sometimes use phasor diagrams to solve problems, but it is really nothing more than a shift in time. That shift in time is 1/3 of a cycle. Since 1 cycle is 1/60th of a second (at 60 hertz), then 1/3 of that is 1/180th of a second (0.005 sec).

What that means is that when one of our sine waves crosses zero, the next sine wave won't cross zero for another 0.005 seconds. It's been delayed from the first sine wave.

The next thing to realize is that each of the phases in the system is just a single voltage reference. You need two reference points to record a voltage, and our voltmeter is reading just the difference between those points.

Consider two people walking down a 2-lane road with a tape measure stretched between them. They are both told to walk the same speed, so they are always even with each other. They are also told that they have to switch lanes every 10 seconds, but not at the same time. The second person has to wait 3 seconds from the first before he can cross the line, but still 10 seconds apart from his previous crossing.

At any instant in time, you may have both people in the left lane, both in the right lane, or one in each lane. The tape measure stretched between them is going to be constantly changing as they get closer and farther apart. You would think that they would be farthest apart when one of them is at the shoulder, but the second person is already heading toward the center line, so he is closing their distance. They are also not closest together when either one of them crosses the center line because the other one is somewhere in the middle of the other lane.

The tape measure stretched between the two people is analogous to the voltage between phases. It is constantly changing, but its minimums and maximums do not coincide with the minimums and maximums of the two phase voltages (or people's position).

I put together a graph. This was done in SolidWorks, so I don't have a lot of control over making it look pretty. It's only a teaching tool and not intended to be absolutely perfect, so don't nit-pick it. (I know the peak-peak scales are wrong, but its easier to conceptualize.)

In the upper graph, we have the A (red) and B (blue) phase. Their zero-crossings occur 1/3 of a cycle apart. The lower graph represents the difference between them (A-B). The green vertical line represents the point where A-B is a maximum, which is 208 volts.

In the green waveform, its maximum occurs when the difference between A and B is greatest, and it crosses zero when A and B are equal. Its zero crossing occurs 30 degrees before A's zero crossing. However, notice that the lower graph has a new coordinate system that starts when the green line crosses zero. I could have carried the time coordinate system from the upper graph, and that would show the 30 degree time shift in the new graph, but time is relative, and we can set the starting point to what ever is convenient.

AddPhases.jpg
 
Location
Ohio
The reason for this argument is theory vs application, and reference point.

Yes, there is no neutral at the load. We understand that. But in order to explain how we get a certain voltage at the load, we are explaining what goes on at the panel/transformer. We are only discussing neutral as a voltage reference, not a physical wire at the load.

To take something at face value is easy. Learning is always complicating the matter. OP wanted to learn.
 

ggunn

PE (Electrical), NABCEP certified
Location
Austin, TX, USA
Occupation
Consulting Electrical Engineer - Photovoltaic Systems
But no neutral is involved so why complicate matters by introducing it?
The OP brought the neutral into the discussion when he asked about phase difference between the voltage waveforms on the conductors. That phase difference is only there if you reference the voltages to neutral/ground, as you correctly pointed out.

I assumed that the OP wanted to understand how all this works together, not just to be told not to worry his pretty little head about the neutral. ;^)
 
Last edited:

Smart $

Esteemed Member
Location
Ohio
An issue worth noting is that Rick's diagram uses rms voltages as instantaneous values. The correct values are the indicated values times the square root of 2. This applies to measurements parallel to the vertical (Y) axis only.
120VAC has an instantaneous peak of 169.7V above reference.
208VAC has an instantaneous peak of 293.9V above reference.​
 

ggunn

PE (Electrical), NABCEP certified
Location
Austin, TX, USA
Occupation
Consulting Electrical Engineer - Photovoltaic Systems
An issue worth noting is that Rick's diagram uses rms voltages as instantaneous values. The correct values are the indicated values times the square root of 2. This applies to measurements parallel to the vertical (Y) axis only.
120VAC has an instantaneous peak of 169.7V above reference.
208VAC has an instantaneous peak of 293.9V above reference.​
And time delay cannot be expressed in degrees. It should be 5.56ms. :cool:
 

Besoeker

Senior Member
Location
UK
An issue worth noting is that Rick's diagram uses rms voltages as instantaneous values.
I made a similar comment, now lost because of forum problems.
See this from post #81.
(I know the peak-peak scales are wrong, but its easier to conceptualize.)
I did apopogise for having overlooked that but the apology went the same way as my comment.
 

Rick Christopherson

Senior Member
I made a similar comment, now lost because of forum problems.
See this from post #81.

I did apopogise for having overlooked that but the apology went the same way as my comment.
Yeah, I had seen your comments before the forum went kablouey. :D

As I had point out pre-Apocalypse, my original posting had the following:
It's only a teaching tool and not intended to be absolutely perfect, so don't nit-pick it. (I know the peak-peak scales are wrong, but its easier to conceptualize.)
 

skeshesh

Senior Member
Location
Los Angeles, Ca
I think, in the context of your diagram, the 120 degrees phase difference is what matters. The time depends on the frequency.

Surely someone will soon comment on how system frequency should be discussed in relation to this topic as well since it's important in establishing proper theory :p

But seriously, I'm convinced that the continuation of this thread is some sort of backhanded deal someone made with Chris based on post #4 ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top