Why only 10?it should have lasted 10
Why only 10?it should have lasted 10
why only 5? You think that is acceptableWhy only 10?
We don't know that.why only 5? You think that is acceptable
10+ if sized properly
it was running at 112%+
We don't know that.
But my point was that it did run for FIVE years, If it was operating significantly beyond specification, and we don't know that it was, one might have expected a fault code to have been flagged up.
Utterly astonishingly astoundingly that it achieved five years.
But what do I know?
And that exceeded the drive rating?yes we do
he measured the i
yesAnd that exceeded the drive rating?
Remind what the drive input current rating is?yes
the i was measured after the xfmr (4:1) at 35 A
since you were 'astonished' that it lasted 5 years
miraculous lol
not concerned with the inputRemind what the drive input current rating is?
OK.not concerned with the input
glad you realized that
glad you realized that
he measured the output after the xfmr