get back to us with those reciepts, now. we are dying to know.
Does anyone keep receipts for stuff they bought years ago............
No? So maybe it's time to book your slot at the funeral parlour............
get back to us with those reciepts, now. we are dying to know.
:happysad: what would compel someone to give combined lumen of three specific lamps but provide the wattage for something as abstract as the whole room anyhow?
:happysad: what would compel someone to endlessly debate..... nevermind. i got it.
"Just then they came in sight of thirty or forty windmills that rise from that plain.
And no sooner did Don Quixote see them that he said to his squire,
"Fortune is guiding our affairs better than we ourselves could have wished.
Do you see over yonder, friend Sancho, thirty or forty hulking giants?
I intend to do battle with them and slay them. With their spoils we shall begin
to be rich for this is a righteous war and the removal of so foul a brood from
off the face of the earth is a service God will bless."
I agree what the point, as my experience is very positive.
Before we (a city) converted to LED signal heads, I would typically get a call at 2:00 am for a lamp out, call a second person, roll a bucket truck to replace a lamp. With LEDs in place now for 15 - 20 years I may get one call a year to replace a lamp.
Energy savings are considerable, take an 8 phase intersection, 4 thru movements and 4 left turns with 165 watt inc lamps, do the math when you convert to a 20 watt head.
The LED signal displays are very reliable few failures and have at least a 5 year warranty.
They work good. Well, aside from frost build upon on red light of LED traffic lights that led to a several fatal accidents.
It is almost always the ballast that fails in LED lighting.
Drivers are used for LEDs not ballasts
170722-2118 EDT
It seems that a lot of readers are critical of what Electric-Light has to say.
In my opinion you should study what he has to say, and then enter into an intelligent discussion with him on any points you agree or disagree with...
I would like to study what he has to say, but his posts are so long when I look at them it takes me to the same place in my brain as when my wife starts talking about the neighbours or her family. However, I've skimmed through enough of his posts that I get it. He is on a mission. He's not interested in intelligent discussion, he is interested in someone taking the bait and then he is going to wear them down in a barrage of words and figures. Meanwhile, the world is going LED and is not turning back. He's not he Dutch boy with his finger in the dyke, he's the sailor left high and dry after the ship has sailed.
That is pretty close to how I see it. Explore the tech or don't explore the tech. But to be dismissive because you don't have the time or stamina to dig in and do some detailed homework is smallish, for lack of a better word.170722-2118 EDT
It seems that a lot of readers are critical of what Electric-Light has to say.
In my opinion you should study what he has to say, and then enter into an intelligent discussion with him on any points you agree or disagree with.
Unfortunately the acronym LED is applied to many different items from the very basic LED chip, to some very complex device. Thus, it can be difficult when the word LED is used to know what is being discussed, or what should be considered as the problem.
I have LEDs that I first used circa 1965 that still work. I have CREE LED bulbs made in recent years that do not work correctly, they cycle on and off with a period of minutes (clearly a thermal problem). But it is not fair to compare the 1965 devices with the 2015 devices.
.
Cutesy but lacking in substance. Either dig in and debate on science or don't.I would like to study what he has to say, but his posts are so long when I look at them it takes me to the same place in my brain as when my wife starts talking about the neighbours or her family. However, I've skimmed through enough of his posts that I get it. He is on a mission. He's not interested in intelligent discussion, he is interested in someone taking the bait and then he is going to wear them down in a barrage of words and figures. Meanwhile, the world is going LED and is not turning back. He's not he Dutch boy with his finger in the dyke, he's the sailor left high and dry after the ship has sailed.
Cutesy but lacking in substance. Either dig in and debate on science or don't....
Like CFLs?I don't,,, haven't,,, won't dig into the debate.
LEDs sales are market driven. You can't subsidize a good idea into success, you can't stop a good idea from succeeding. Argue about them, fight the fight against them all you want, point out as many flaws about them as you can, they are going to be more of them installed every day.
or AFCIs?Like CFLs?
Like CFLs?
or AFCIs?
I did. They were dismissed. Discussion doesn't come into it.Cutesy but lacking in substance. Either dig in and debate on science or don't.
If one can be wore down by words and figures perhaps they were ill-equipped to be in the debate to start with. Adequate opposing facts and figures do not get "worn" but can stand on their own.
I actually like the LEDs better than the CFLs. CFLs were over-pushed as the best solution. I don't mind the LEDs, I would just like better info and less hype so I can make a better deployment decision so I don't send out something before it has been fully cooked.I have had good luck with CFLs. A quick count figures about 20 of them in my house. AFCIs are another issue altogether and you know that.
I thought your points were adequately refuted with sound enough facts. Your points seemed more subjective in nature and were not just dismissed without substantiation.I did. They were dismissed. Discussion doesn't come into it.
Simple enough.I thought your points were adequately refuted with sound enough facts. Your points seemed more subjective in nature and were not just dismissed without substantiation.
If you took issue with the counter argument, then provide better counter points. His argument seemed reasonable enough to me on the surface.