mivey
Senior Member
Original and related: 938 1180 1213 1237 1263 1266 1294/1295And I'm still interested in your response to 888 - I can't find it
Original and related: 938 1180 1213 1237 1263 1266 1294/1295And I'm still interested in your response to 888 - I can't find it
They can cause a minor phase shift between the output voltages. I made that point to show that the two voltages were not exact reversals of each other like you have when reversing a two-wire voltage. The other point about load was that it shows how the voltages are being used (in phase or phase opposed). No different than identifying the use like when we say we are using it as a 120 volt source or using it as a 240 volt source.Then are you saying the load's characteristics are irrelevant to the phase of transformer secondary voltages?
I didn't make the point that the load characteristics are irrelevant to the phase of transformer secondary voltages.Then are you saying the load's characteristics are irrelevant to the phase of transformer secondary voltages?
I made no such assertion.Athough, that still would not have changed Besoeker's assertment that V12 and V34 must be in series because they can be paralleled.
I like simple too. So either the load's characteristics are relevant to the transformer secondary voltages or they aren't. That's how I'm trying to simplify the discussion.I didn't make the point that the load characteristics are irrelevant to the phase of transformer secondary voltages.
The point I made is that, with a resistive load, the voltage and current will be in phase. That's the case whether or not there is a rectifier in circuit.
If the currents are not in phase, and clearly they are not, then the voltages can't be in phase.
It's simple. I like simple.
Finally a definitive answer - the two output voltages of a standard 120/240V (two reconnectable windings) transformer are in-phase.I agree with you that Vx1x2 and Vx3x4 are in phase...
All the way back to the basic math of Vnb * -1 = Vbn, but in Bes's rectifier circuit we need to establish values V1n (L1) and V2n (L2). Then
V1n = Vx1x2 and
V2n = Vx4x3 not Vx3X4.
I have been very specific in keeping my discussion to the real world, 'run of the mill', installed in millions of locations, single winding center-tapped transformer with its extrememly common customer owned cousin (a two winding reconnectable version).120223-2106
For all those that are hung up on a continuous secondary coil with a center tap being one continuous thing I can make a transformer with a continuous winding, meaning I do not cut the wire in the middle while winding the coil, that puts X1 in-phase with X4 and thus I can connect X1 to X4 with no sparks. Also now the center tap voltage is not midway between X1 and X4.
My apologies on the quote, I meant to say you asserted that V12 and V34 are in-phase or they could not be paralleled.jim dungar said:Athough, that still would not have changed Besoeker's assertment that V12 and V34 must be in series because they can be paralleled.
I made no such assertion.
The load will affect the voltage some, of course. But, within the rating, not to any great extent as a rule.I like simple too. So either the load's characteristics are relevant to the transformer secondary voltages or they aren't. That's how I'm trying to simplify the discussion.
Are Ia and Ib in phase?To make Besoeker's circuit work, absolutely nothing is changed (the windings are physically connected Vx1x2+Vx3x4) except our reference point, which moved from the windings' ends to a common node. The rectifier circuit, actually, functions regardless of which reference point we choose to connect our measurement device (scope) to, therefore the visible waveform directions do not define the 'phasing' of the transformer output voltages.
First is that I have presented real drawings and pictures of real things that we have made in support of my points about the not single phase argument. As far as I can tell, not a single other poster has reciprocated.
For the rectifier circuit shown in #1004, are Ia and Ib in phase?There is nothing you have posted that cannot be explained using the single-phase point of view.
Your circuits work because of the way they are wired. Not because of what you see on your scope.
Finally a definitive answer - the two output voltages of a standard 120/240V (two reconnectable windings) transformer are in-phase.
All the way back to the basic math of Vnb * -1 = Vbn
To make Besoeker's circuit work, absolutely nothing is changed (the windings are physically connected Vx1x2+Vx3x4) except our reference point, which moved from the windings' ends to a common node. The rectifier circuit, actually, functions regardless of which reference point we choose to connect our measurement device (scope) to, therefore the visible waveform directions do not define the 'phasing' of the transformer output voltages.
Do the load's characteristics define the phase of the transformer secondary voltages?The load will affect the voltage some, of course. But, within the rating, not to any great extent as a rule.
Of course not.Do the load's characteristics define the phase of the transformer secondary voltages?
Well, he did say V12 was in phase with V34. But he also said V12 was phase-opposed to V43.Finally a definitive answer - the two output voltages of a standard 120/240V (two reconnectable windings) transformer are in-phase.
Nothing will change the POLARITY. Regardless of the connection, V12 will stay in-phase with V34 and phase-opposed to V43.the visible waveform directions do not define the 'phasing' of the transformer output voltages.
Most all of the single-phase transformers we use can be connected A-B&C-D for series additive or A&C-B&D for parallel using the internal terminal board (using the ANSI internal terminal notation). Most of the transformers only have the three external bushings that are tied to the four internal A,B,C,D terminal points. The larger single-phase transformers do come with four external bushings that give external acces to the four internal terminal points.I have been very specific in keeping my discussion to the real world, 'run of the mill', installed in millions of locations, single winding center-tapped transformer with its extrememly common customer owned cousin (a two winding reconnectable version).
No one is saying that V12 and V34 are not in phase. What has been said is that it is also true that V12 and V43 are phase-opposed. My open-wye example shows that usage is physically valid because we make use of aMy apologies on the quote, I meant to say you asserted that V12 and V34 are in-phase or they could not be paralleled.
May we ignore them then?Of course not.
You can if you wish but how they flow in terms of phase and magnitude is a consequence of of the applied voltage and load characteristics.May we ignore them then?
Hanging my hat on it? No. It just had a simple explanation which as we say here, was good enough for government work. And saved a lot of typing.Wikipedia is not exactly a technical reference. I think of it more as a drive-by knowledge dump. Plenty of trash to sort through there.
Hanging your hat on a knowledge dump site? I suggest you spend some time at a university library or take some courses instead of digging through the Wiki-trash (not dissing this particular article as I have not read it but I have found you have to take Wiki with a grain of salt).
emphasis addedMy sources included textbooks, technical reference material, and university lecture material which is different than "a lot of people" and my sources would be what you would use in a technical discussion. "A lot of people" can say "a lot of things".
No. As I told you before, the power flows towards the load as if the wires were a waveguide. The energy flows along both wires towards the load. It travels in the electromagetic field surrounding the wires, not riding in the wires like a line of coal cars traveling back and forth.