I'm with Bob on this. B specifically says the method described is adequate (not needing the pipe to be secured other than within 3' of the box). It specifically says this is adequate, nothing else required.
Now, in practice, I would not install it without securing it, but that's a personal preference and not required by the NEC.
I agree that 358.30(B) states the framing members of the joists are adequate for the support of the EMT. However, 358.30 requires EMT to be secured and supported in accordance with 358.30(A)
and (B). The use of the word "and" essentially clarifies that the NEC considers securing and supporting two different animals and that 358.30 requires the EMT to be
both secured and supported.
If the EMT is secured every 10 feet (and 3 feet from each outlet box, junction box, device box, cabinet, conduit body, or other tubing termination) as required by 358.30(A), chances are the installation also meets the supporting requirements of 358.30(B). I can't imagine how a conduit could be secured without also supporting it.
NEC 358.30(B) permits framing members to be used as the means of support as long the EMT is also secured within 3 feet of termination points. However, it does
not preclude the requirement for also complying with 358.30(A).
Now, I'm not trying to stir the pot. I'm just stating my interpretation of the Code requirements. I heard a very good quote one time that goes something to the effect of, "The Code does not say what you think it says; the Code NEVER says what you want it to say; the Code just says what it says."