Power factor

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ingenieur

Senior Member
Location
Earth
Ok, lets say C goes down, does voltage not drop across a series R?

Yes
as C gets smaller its Z (actually Xc) gets larger ( Xc = 1/(j 2 Pi f C) )
So total loop Z increases
Therefore current gets smaller (assuming a fixed V, i = V/Z)
since current gets smaller so does Vdrop = current x R
 
Last edited:

mbrooke

Batteries Included
Location
United States
Occupation
Technician
Yes
as C gets smaller its Z (actually Xc) gets larger ( Xc = 1/(j 2 Pi f C) )
So total loop Z increases
Therefore current gets smaller (assuming a fixed V, i = V/Z)
since current gets smaller so does Vdrop = current x R

Makes perfect sense. :) However, what would the power factor be in such a case? Take a simple Home Depot 4 watt LED for example.
 

mbrooke

Batteries Included
Location
United States
Occupation
Technician
I thought we were talking equal C & L? If we have a net series RC or RL circuit then as the reactance increases then R sees a lower voltage.

We are, but also what happens when each value changes in relation to the other. However, I can picture parallel X and C, and series X and R, but I still can not understand what happens when X and C are in series. For example, I have never seen a reactor HID ballast with a cap in series for PF correction...
 

Besoeker

Senior Member
Location
UK
R is resistive impedance in ohms and X capactive impedance in ohms?
Yes........but....
In power circuits, capacitors are often used for power factor correction to compensate for lagging power factor.
Industrial loads typically have lagging power factor. The current lags the voltage. This is usually expressed as as a ratio - kW/kVA. Sometimes they are referred to as real and reactive power respectively.

The result is higher current than would be needed for the kW. Larger conductors and more losses. Bigger transformers, switchgear, the whole nine yards if you get my drift. Things that are dimensioned based on current rating.

Capacitors are often used as a fix or improve this situation. Power factor correction. PFC.
In this application, it is not their impedance that is defined. It is kVAr, the r meaning reactactive. Being leading power factor, it compensates for the lagging power factor.
 

mbrooke

Batteries Included
Location
United States
Occupation
Technician
Yes........but....
In power circuits, capacitors are often used for power factor correction to compensate for lagging power factor.
Industrial loads typically have lagging power factor. The current lags the voltage. This is usually expressed as as a ratio - kW/kVA. Sometimes they are referred to as real and reactive power respectively.

The result is higher current than would be needed for the kW. Larger conductors and more losses. Bigger transformers, switchgear, the whole nine yards if you get my drift. Things that are dimensioned based on current rating.

Capacitors are often used as a fix or improve this situation. Power factor correction. PFC.
In this application, it is not their impedance that is defined. It is kVAr, the r meaning reactactive. Being leading power factor, it compensates for the lagging power factor.


I agree, however in a dropper ballast, does a capacitor not actually make power factor worse?
 

GoldDigger

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Placerville, CA, USA
Occupation
Retired PV System Designer
I agree, however in a dropper ballast, does a capacitor not actually make power factor worse?
A series capacitor instead of a transformer can make the power factor worse. But that power factor is on the capacitive side. It will partially compensate for low PF on the inductive side from motors.
It will also be closer to a pure displacement (phase) power factor reduction than the distortion (harmonic) low PF caused by capacitor input rectifiers and power supplies.
 

mbrooke

Batteries Included
Location
United States
Occupation
Technician
A series capacitor instead of a transformer can make the power factor worse. But that power factor is on the capacitive side. It will partially compensate for low PF on the inductive side from motors.
It will also be closer to a pure displacement (phase) power factor reduction than the distortion (harmonic) low PF caused by capacitor input rectifiers and power supplies.


Thank :) I had a suspicion it would be worse. But how does phase displacement tie into harmonics?
 

Besoeker

Senior Member
Location
UK
Thank :) I had a suspicion it would be worse. But how does phase displacement tie into harmonics?
It doesn't really. They are two different things. Displacement and distortion.

Examples.

A common (cage) induction motor usually has a lagging power factor. The current lags the voltage. Capacitors on the supply can be used to compensate for this because the have a leading power factor to cancel out the lagging power factor of the motor. Hence the term power factor correction or PFC.

Distortion, the other flavour, is caused by non-linear loads. Things that draw non-sinusoidal current. VFDs are a common example that gets attention. As a system designer, you know that going in and the design needs to be compliant with applicable standards. The solutions for this are just a tad more complex than slapping some PFC capacitors on the supply. Actually, naked PFC is best avoided in this situation. It can bite you in the bum.

Passive or active harmonic can be used. Multi-pulse rectifiers. Active front VFDs is another. Such solutions obviously come at a cost. Good system design is essential.

But I might mention in passing another issue that tends to slip under the radar. We live in a world where there is an ever increasing load of non-linear devices, much of it at domestic level. Chargers, computers, televisions, CFLs. Such devices generally fall below the level that has to be addressed. But the sheer number of them from every household causes significant harmonic distortion on the supply.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top