Michael15956
Senior Member
- Location
- NE Ohio
Nice story John!
Enjoyed reading it.
Enjoyed reading it.
Pierre C Belarge said:I will add this to my general posts on electrical safety.
I perform mostly inspections and consulting when on jobsites these days. I also perform safety procedures. I have the PPE and the training to know what I can and cannot do. I may not perform it perfectly, but I am a lot, repeat, a lot safer in my work habits than I have been in the past.
Wow, confused on this part though.cowboyjwc said:Turns out that it was lead coated conductors and somehow I had striped the first one with out touching the lead and the copper at the same time of course not so luck on the second one
This is not allowed in our area, if you do dissconnect you will be assessed a fine.Michael15956 said:OK, I'll try this.
Has anyone who has installed residential over head service upgrades contacted the local power company and have them disconnect the supply power? If so, how were the results?
Thanks,
Michael
jim1 said:With the proper PPE this work can be done NFPA 70E.
Possibly true. Oddly, this is right from one POCO's rules book:wireman71 said:I personally don't think I get paid enough to do live service changes..!
JohnConnolly said:1. POCO shows up late (or not at all..whoops) The guys are there to do the work, the customer has planned his day around it and because of an error in the office, no one shows up. It happens all the time here.
do it hot said:I know that cuting a service loose and reconnecting,can be done safely.
Most of us have done it. (service electricians):
1910.333(a)(1)
"Deenergized parts." Live parts to which an employee may be exposed shall be deenergized before the employee works on or near them, unless the employer can demonstrate that deenergizing introduces additional or increased hazards or is infeasible due to equipment design or operational limitations. Live parts that operate at less than 50 volts to ground need not be deenergized if there will be no increased exposure to electrical burns or to explosion due to electric arcs.
Note 1: Examples of increased or additional hazards include interruption of life support equipment, deactivation of emergency alarm systems, shutdown of hazardous location ventilation equipment, or removal of illumination for an area.
Note 2: Examples of work that may be performed on or near energized circuit parts because of infeasibility due to equipment design or operational limitations include testing of electric circuits that can only be performed with the circuit energized and work on circuits that form an integral part of a continuous industrial process in a chemical plant that would otherwise need to be completely shut down in order to permit work on one circuit or piece of equipment.
Note 3: Work on or near deenergized parts is covered by paragraph (b) of this section.
iwire said:Note 1: Examples of increased or additional hazards include ... ...removal of illumination for an area.
realolman said:Killing the lights is an acceptable reason to do it hot?:-?
unless the employer can demonstrate that deenergizing introduces additional or increased hazards or is infeasible due to equipment design or operational limitations