ground wire clockwise around ground screws

Status
Not open for further replies.
jxofaltrds said:
Did it once as a helper. Thought it was crap work then and still do to this day. I have never seeing this shown as an exceptable method anywhere. Just because you do it and are good at it does not make it craftsmanlike.

i do not believe that it is a good mechanical connection. They call them terminals for a reason.
Click to expand...

Do you reject this practice as an inspector and if so what is your basis for rejection (code section)?

I have done things that an inspector has said he didn't like before but yet had him say "I don't see why you can't do it either". Inspector is supposed to inspect to codes or official amendments to the codes, not to his opinion. There are rare cases where it comes to opinion but if they make a quick decision it is likley because similar thing has been done before and they are being consistant with that situation, otherwise they often make no immediate decision and maybe even discuss the situation with their supervisor or other colleagues.
 
jxofaltrds said:
Did it once as a helper. Thought it was crap work then and still do to this day.
Click to expand...
To each his own.

jxofaltrds said:
I have never seeing this shown as an exceptable method anywhere. Just because you do it and are good at it does not make it craftsmanlike.
Click to expand...
I'm a high-quality, skilled craftsman and use this method. I was taught by craftsman in the industry who were of the highest skill and quality and they also used this method. An accepted method used by quality, skilled craftsmen would seem to me to be the very definition of craftsmanlike.

jxofaltrds said:
i do not believe that it is a good mechanical connection.
Click to expand...
Just your opinion. I have seen many other type connections that were not good connections either but that was a result of the work quality. Quality work will produce a quality result. Not all of us have to try to "idiot-proof" our work.

jxofaltrds said:
They call them terminals for a reason.
Click to expand...
I'm sure they do.
 
kwired said:
Do you reject this practice as an inspector and if so what is your basis for rejection (code section)?

I have done things that an inspector has said he didn't like before but yet had him say "I don't see why you can't do it either". Inspector is supposed to inspect to codes or official amendments to the codes, not to his opinion. There are rare cases where it comes to opinion but if they make a quick decision it is likley because similar thing has been done before and they are being consistant with that situation, otherwise they often make no immediate decision and maybe even discuss the situation with their supervisor or other colleagues.
Click to expand...

Would I reject it? No.

I believe that this is self-policing:

110.12 Mechanical Execution of Work. Electrical equipment
shall be installed in a neat and workmanlike manner.
 
jxofaltrds said:
Would I reject it? No.

I believe that this is self-policing:

110.12 Mechanical Execution of Work. Electrical equipment
shall be installed in a neat and workmanlike manner.
Click to expand...

I hope you have never used 110.12 as basis for failing an inspection.

What is the standard for neat and workmanlike? Sounds like something very opinionated and no definite standards exist. Most of the time if you feel something is not neat and workmanlike you can find something to cite other than "I don't like it".
 
binney said:
Yes, this is a real question! We recently failed an inspection for having the solid #12 ground wire of a MC wrapped counter-clockwise around the 10-32 ground screw to a metal 4"sq box.

I personally agree with the inspector. The problem is I can't find anything to back it up. I've looked in UL, manufacturer intructions, and NEC of course. I was able to find some manufacturer instructions for devices mentioning wrapping the wire clockwise around the terminal screws. Nothing specific to ground screws.

Some may ask, who gives a damn? But common kmowledge tells us when tightening the ground screw, the wire will tend to be pushed out when going the opposing direction. Therefore, by wrapping the wire clockwise you are getting a better more reliable connection.

So, to get to the point. Help me prove it is a code violation to wrap the wire counter-clockwise.

I'm counting on your help and support in this highly important subject.
Click to expand...

Watch the video on this page!

PS See any code violations?

http://www.leviton.com/OA_HTML/ProductDetail.jsp?partnumber=T5320&section=42524&minisite=10251
 
kwired said:
I hope you have never used 110.12 as basis for failing an inspection.

What is the standard for neat and workmanlike? Sounds like something very opinionated and no definite standards exist. Most of the time if you feel something is not neat and workmanlike you can find something to cite other than "I don't like it".
Click to expand...

What part of self-policing did you not understand?
 
jxofaltrds said:
Watch the video on this page!

PS See any code violations?
Click to expand...
Yeah. As well as someone who needs some more lessons on how to install a receptacle. IMO, it looks like he has been doing this type work for less than a day with sub-standard training.
 
mivey said:
Yeah. As well as someone who needs some more lessons on how to install a receptacle. IMO, it looks like he has been doing this type work for less than a day with sub-standard training.
Click to expand...


Sounds like his training was good. He had the ground down!:lol:
 
kwired said:
Well apparently it does not work - we have all these conductors out there looped around device terminals and we shouldn't have that:p
Click to expand...

mivey said:
Yeah. As well as someone who needs some more lessons on how to install a receptacle. IMO, it looks like he has been doing this type work for less than a day with sub-standard training.
Click to expand...

Little Bill said:
Sounds like his training was good. He had the ground down!:lol:
Click to expand...

At least we have fun at the end of the day!
 
K8MHZ said:
The best part is now I know the reason for the practice of keeping the cover plate screw slots vertical!
Click to expand...
Yeah, that was a bunch of hooey!:)

His talk of how he likes to do this & that and yet he can barely get a wire around the terminal, can't keep it under the screw, and does not know how to use his strippers. Not a glowing resume as far as I'm concerned.
 
mivey said:
Yeah, that was a bunch of hooey!:)

His talk of how he likes to do this & that and yet he can barely get a wire around the terminal, can't keep it under the screw, and does not know how to use his strippers. Not a glowing resume as far as I'm concerned.
Click to expand...

And I was going to use this to help explain 110.3(B)!:weeping:
 
mastery of mechanical ability

mastery of mechanical ability

RE: Leviton guy

it's not so much his apparent lack of mechanical skills, but rather he is just left-handed.
 
drewsserviceco said:
RE: Leviton guy

it's not so much his apparent lack of mechanical skills, but rather he is just left-handed.
Click to expand...
I'm not left-handed so I don't know for sure, but I would not see how that would make much difference. A repetitive skill is a repetitive skill, right? I find it hard to believe but are lefties really disadvantaged by the thread directions?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top