Isn't S known?
It is P and Q which are not, correct?
Does it really matter regarding winding phase current?
You nailed it. Windings are rated in kVA or just amps!
Isn't S known?
It is P and Q which are not, correct?
Does it really matter regarding winding phase current?
Whoa! Whoa!InJunEar...
See, others are learning! Here's the rest!
Part 1, only V and A are known, so S (Apparent Power) = V x A = 126 x 56.3 = 7,150 VA!
Part 2, since P = 1,182 W (Real Power) is now known, then Q (Reactive Power) = Sqrt(S^2 - P^2) = 7,052 VAr!
I hate to ask the following of you, but since you didn't participate, how about revealing the load's power-factor... lagging or leading (decimal or %'s acceptable)!
Phil
As written, only the magnitude of S is known.Isn't S known?
It is P and Q which are not, correct?
Does it really matter regarding winding phase current?
I am aware of that. Please keep the response simple. S* [scalar value; magnitude, if you will] is known, correct? P* and Q* are not, correct?As written, only the magnitude of S is known.
If the phase offset on one L-L current is different than that of another connected to the same line it affects the magnitude of the corresponding L-N current and vice versa.
It is not relevant as long as the phase angle of all three loads is the same.I am aware of that. Please keep the response simple. S* [scalar value; magnitude, if you will] is known, correct? P* and Q* are not, correct?
*If we knew P or Q we could establish S vector.
How is knowing P and /or Q relevant?
What would knowing P and/or Q change?
I assume you mean the same phi (difference of current to voltage angle).It is not relevant as long as the phase angle of all three loads is the same.
You want only phase current magnitudes. Kirchoff current law is applicable to both dc and ac circuits. So it should be applicable in an ac circuit with effective dc values only. So by considering line currents as dc values and replacing transformers by ideal dc sources (as a first approximation ) and by applying Kirchoff current law, equivalent dc phase current and so solution to your problem may be found.Good day, all.I require assistance in determining how to calculate whether one transformer in a three phase star/delta bank is overloaded based on the line current on the delta side (load side).I know that I can simply have a lineman take readings at the transformer at the X1 or X3 terminals, but I need to know how to calculate it.So for example, let's say that the bank consists of 50,75, 50 kVA transformers, and the line currents on the delta (load) side are taken to be 256A, 294A, 341A, how do I work out the phase currents in the delta side of the transformer? View attachment 15212 Thank you in advance.
Sorry. I committed blunder: Kirchoff law cannot be appled that way..................Well another try. Suppose phase sequence of line currents is known. Then line currents can be represented in trigonometric form as functions of time. Each line current may also be represented as difference between respective phase currents also in trigonometric forms by applying kirchoff law. The resulting equations may be solved for an arbitrary instant of time to find intantaneous values of phase currents. From that it is easy to find RMS values.You want only phase current magnitudes. Kirchoff current law is applicable to both dc and ac circuits. So it should be applicable in an ac circuit with effective dc values only. So by considering line currents as dc values and replacing transformers by ideal dc sources (as a first approximation ) and by applying Kirchoff current law, equivalent dc phase current and so solution to your problem may be found.
InJunEar...
Your wrong again! Both Q and S can be easily calculated! Knowledge of Xfmr %Z is unnecessary. The effect of %Z is already implicit in the OP's stated line-current values!
Phil
Isn't S known?
It is P and Q which are not, correct?
Does it really matter regarding winding phase current?
AHA! I traced his "example" back to post #75.Whoa! Whoa!
We know S, and not P or Q, is what I said. How did we jump to knowing P in Part 2?
...
So it's just another "if" scenario that leads us nowhere, right?You are correct
but with the given info P or Q can't be calculated
either one will give power factor
his example is easily calculated...
Fellas...
I'm not going to play your game of Obfuscation (typical of most engineers)! If anyone is interested in what I call "Vectors from Magnitudes" contact me off-forum!
Regards, Phil Corso
AHA! I traced his "example" back to post #75.
Simple answers are best. It seems no one knows how to do that.
So it's just another "if" scenario that leads us nowhere, right?
I've often said people have a tendency to tell on themselves:
You have to be in the forest when the tree falls to hear his answer. :happyyes:I'll buy anyone a beer (craft import to boot!) who can get mr phil to answer my question
:roll:
If a tree falls in the forest what is the power factor?
You have to be in the forest when the tree falls to hear his answer. :happyyes:
InJunEar,
Just contact me off-forum!
Phil