kwired
Electron manager
- Location
- NE Nebraska
NEC is about electrical safety not energy conservation.Of course, there is no direct connection of the energy conservation concept with the thread. It is only an 'in case the OP implies it' point.
Well, what it means when NEC does not make voltage drop limits along the conductors mandatory (which ensures limiting energy loss) but just an option, for example?
I will say it has gone too far beyond safety with some of the requirements, but has not really encroached on energy conservation (so far).
Conservation is a design issue that goes beyond the safety requirements that are covered by NEC.
If you want to run a large conductor to prevent losses, NEC does not stop you from doing so.
It does prohibit running too small of a conductor where heating of that conductor could introduce other hazards.
We can debate what level of design/protection may provide a particular level of safety or should have been used in the NEC but the concept of NEC on that topic is still intended to be prevention of overheating of conductors and potential hazards that may develop at certain load levels and not a focus on how much energy may be "wasted" in a particular install.
We do have energy codes that focus on those types of things - though they are not always something enforced in all areas of the country.