packersparky
Senior Member
- Location
- Wisconsin
- Occupation
- Inspector
Wow, that was from left field and took me by surprise. Gotta think about that viewpoint...
To be clear, I do not agree with JFletcher.
Wow, that was from left field and took me by surprise. Gotta think about that viewpoint...
To be clear, I do not agree with JFletcher.
Yes. You must have at least 2 SABC's and at least two of them must serve the counter top receptacles. Makes it more difficult to meet the requirement in some extremely small apartments that have almost no counter, but a multiwire circuit to a single duplex does meet that requirement in those situations also.Am I meeting code if I install 2 SABCs, use one for all the recs in dining room, pantry, wall kitchen, refrigeration, and all but one countertop rec and then use the other SABC for that one countertop rec?
I agree it would. Before you could run another SABC for an individual branch circuit, but now you can run same individual BC as a 15 amp circuit. You can't replace a 210.52(A) required receptacle with the individual BC though.Before this change I actually got into an argument with a HI about adding a individual circuit of a 120V 15A to an existing, up to code, circuit for a window AC in the dining room.
I said no.
I explained that it would be a SABC and had to be 20A. He argued fiercely, I won.
The new exception would allow it.
It does, see below.Now, let's open up the debate on whether the 2017 NEC exception for single receptacle outlet means simplex receptacle.:lol:
Some are taking "a receptacle outlet" and saying a duplex is "a receptacle outlet", may or may not be, doesn't matter, keep reading past that wording....it says "supplied by an individual branch circuit" then look at art 100 definition for individual branch circuit, pretty certain it says something to the effect of "that supplies only utilization equipment". A duplex receptacle is capable of supplying more than one utilization equipment.And yes the way I read the exception in the 2017 code, the phrase "a receptacle outlet" rules out the use of duplex receptacles on additional 15 amp circuits to the kitchen... One would have to use a Simplex in my opinion.
Yes. You must have at least 2 SABC's and at least two of them must serve the counter top receptacles. Makes it more difficult to meet the requirement in some extremely small apartments that have almost no counter, but a multiwire circuit to a single duplex does meet that requirement in those situations also.
I agree it would. Before you could run another SABC for an individual branch circuit, but now you can run same individual BC as a 15 amp circuit. You can't replace a 210.52(A) required receptacle with the individual BC though.
It does, see below.
Some are taking "a receptacle outlet" and saying a duplex is "a receptacle outlet", may or may not be, doesn't matter, keep reading past that wording....it says "supplied by an individual branch circuit" then look at art 100 definition for individual branch circuit, pretty certain it says something to the effect of "that supplies only utilization equipment". A duplex receptacle is capable of supplying more than one utilization equipment.
No, but if you plug in two utilization equipment you are no longer supplying one. It does say it supplies only one utilization equipment. Most inspectors will not say it is an individual branch circuit if there is more than one receptacle outlet in the circuit. I will agree it is reading between the lines to some extent considering how it is worded.The definition does not say an individual branch circuit must only be capable of supplying one piece of utilization equipment.
According to your logic 210.52(A)(1) would not allow duplex receptacles because it says "receptacle outlet" in the singular.
(1) Spacing. Receptacles shall be installed such that no point
measured horizontally along the floor line of any wall space is
more than 1.8 m (6 ft) from a receptacle outlet.
According to your logic 210.52(A)(1) would not allow duplex receptacles because it says "receptacle outlet" in the singular.
(1) Spacing. Receptacles shall be installed such that no point
measured horizontally along the floor line of any wall space is
more than 1.8 m (6 ft) from a receptacle outlet.
I agree with Fletcher here.According to your logic 210.52(A)(1) would not allow duplex receptacles because it says "receptacle outlet" in the singular.
(1) Spacing. Receptacles shall be installed such that no point
measured horizontally along the floor line of any wall space is
more than 1.8 m (6 ft) from a receptacle outlet.
Not to argue, but to further counter this point, I believe one could install Simplex receptacles every 12 ft in rooms in a house and be code compliant... In this case the code is saying no more than 6 feet from a receptacle, it is not limiting how many receptacles can be there... Could be a Simplex, could be a duplex, you could have 4 duplex receptacles in a 4 Gang Box every 3 ft if you wanted.
Am I meeting code if I install 2 SABCs, use one for all the recs in dining room, pantry, wall kitchen, refrigeration, and all but one countertop rec and then use the other SABC for that one countertop rec?
I don't agree; the outlet is the box, not the device.
If we were talking hardwired only, I would agree with you.
For the article 100 definition of an outlet, an outlet is "a point on the wiring system which current is taken to supply utilization equipment". "A point", "a receptacle outlet" are both singular, and more to the point in the 2017 exception to 210.52, "a receptacle outlet' is singular.
Let me put it another way: if one were wiring under the 2017 NEC code, and put a duplex receptacle on a 15 amp individual branch circuit in the kitchen, a kitchen which met all of the requirements for sabc's, would you gig this as an inspector? As an installer, if you were red tagged, how would you defend your installation?
For load calculations in 220.14 that counts as four receptacles at 90 VA each. For a fixed multioutlet assembly (plugmold) it depends on expected loading could count 5 feet as one outlet @ 180VA or 1 foot as one outlet @ 180VA, regardless of how many receptacles actually are present. This all is for general use receptacles that are not intended for a specific load. If you have a specific intended load you must use the actual load for load calculations on the intended outlet. There still is no load limit per general use receptacle at dwellings for the sake of load calculations though.Lets say I used one of those four square 4 outlet single yoke devides... the inspector then tells me it is four separate outlets... It is one device that covers the power for four appliances possibly but... it is a single point in the wiring system to supply the utilization equipment and there is nothing in that definition to count the number of equipment that is being suppied or it would state supply one piece of utilization equipment.
I would counter that not all outlets are receptacle outlets; a lighting outlet, for example. The ceiling fixture is not the outlet, the opening through which we access the conductors is.P.S. Larry Fine, as you can read, I disagree with your take that a "box" is the outlet.
The actual "outlet" point is sometimes not all that clear. A luminaire mounted on a box - the "outlet" is somewhere between the box and luminaire, exactly where possibly is still debatable. It is not the box, the box isn't a conductor, if it is metallic box it certainly isn't a conductor supplying the luminaire though it could be part of the EGC path.I would counter that not all outlets are receptacle outlets; a lighting outlet, for example. The ceiling fixture is not the outlet, the opening through which we access the conductors is.
Okay, the outlet is the volume of space contained within the box.The actual "outlet" point is sometimes not all that clear. A luminaire mounted on a box - the "outlet" is somewhere between the box and luminaire, exactly where possibly is still debatable. It is not the box, the box isn't a conductor, if it is metallic box it certainly isn't a conductor supplying the luminaire though it could be part of the EGC path.
I'd say no, only the point of entrance of the first luminaire.A luminaire with the supply wiring method directly entering the luminaire - that point is within the luminaire, but exactly where within the luminaire may also be a little debatable. Is it the point of entry of supply conductors? Is it at the point where supply conductors connect to conductors that came with the luminaire? If you have a continuous end to end run of linear fixtures don't you have supply conductors and an outlet within in each luminaire?
Isn't each individual luminaire an individual "utilization equipment"?Okay, the outlet is the volume of space contained within the box.
I'd say no, only the point of entrance of the first luminaire.
Yes, but only the first one receives power from the building electrical system; each one after that receives its power from the previous one.Isn't each individual luminaire an individual "utilization equipment"?
I don't agree; the outlet is the box, not the device.
To me, a duplex receptacle is still singular, i.e., it's still only one outlet.
I agree here that the outlet is what they will call for and not the device itself so if you used a 6 outlet device here it would still count... something like the outlet strip i saw in another post for under the upper cabinets... on its own circuit.
2017 NEC
Article 100 Definitions
Outlet. A point on the wiring system at which current is taken to supply utilization equipment.
2017 NEC
Article 100 Definitions
Receptacle. A contact device installed at an outlet for the connection of an attachment plug, or for the direct connection of electrical utilization equipment designed to mate with the corresponding contact device. A single receptacle is a single contact device with no other contact device on the same yoke. A multiple receptacle is two or more contact devices on the same yoke.