Two circuits feeding one load

Merry Christmas
Status
Not open for further replies.
roger said:
Rick, look at post # 11, this is simply a one line diagram and the grounded conductor is not shown.

Roger

You mean this?

parallelbreakers4.jpg
 
480sparky said:
Is this a more accurate drawing?


parallelbreakers3.jpg

Now you have burned up the 120 volt load by supplying it with 240 volts.

Go back to the original illustration and think about it.

Roger
 
480sparky said:
There will be zero volts across the loads.

Draw it out with arrows for current flow, you will see a complete 40 amp circuit.

BTW, after the load we will definitely see zero volts. ;) :D

Roger
 
480sparky said:
It won't work that way anyway.... they're on the same phase, so there's no voltage.


Wha, for a minute, I thought my mind was goings nuts, (frig)?????
 
Last edited by a moderator:
roger said:
Draw it out with arrows for current flow, you will see a complete 40 amp circuit.

BTW, after the load we will definitely see zero volts. ;) :D

Roger

failure_to_communicate.jpg

"What we have here is a failure to communicate."​

You quoted me before I could edit my response.
 
480sparky said:
Where is it stated the load is 120v?

Look at the illustration. :roll:




You've overloaded the neutral, then.

Wrong.

Once again, your taking a simple one line diagram and not thinking it through, both sides of the circuit would be identical, i.e., they would both have a grounded conductor. (not a neutral)

Roger
 
roger said:
Wrong.

Once again, your taking a simple one line diagram and not thinking it through, both sides of the circuit would be identical, i.e., they would both have a grounded conductor. (not a neutral)

Roger

And it would carry the sum of the amps coming from both breakers. This is not a MWBC.
 
480sparky said:
And it would carry the sum of the amps coming from both breakers.

Yes it would.

Think of taking a 40 amp single pole breaker and running two equal #12 conductors to a single 40 amp heating element, if you were to put an ammeter on the conductors one at a time they would be carrying 1/2 the load current which would be 20 amps.

Feeding two individual conductors with 20 amp breakers on the same leg or phase would achieve the same results.

Of course this is a violation of 240.8 in the real world.

Roger
 
roger said:
Yes it would.

Feeding two individual conductors with 20 amp breakers on the same leg or phase would achieve the same results.


Roger

of course this can't be a real situation because of field conditions and use. Having a disclaimer in the instructions to install on the same phase would'nt work unless the unit was rated for a maximum 240 volt
 
RUWired said:
of course this can't be a real situation because of field conditions and use. Having a disclaimer in the instructions to install on the same phase would'nt work unless the unit was rated for a maximum 240 volt

Why? In this exercise the unit is is 120 volt and would fry on a higher voltage.

Roger
 
roger said:
Yes it would.

Think of taking a 40 amp single pole breaker and running two equal #12 conductors to a single 40 amp heating element, if you were to put an ammeter on the conductors one at a time they would be carrying 1/2 the load current which would be 20 amps.

Feeding two individual conductors with 20 amp breakers on the same leg or phase would achieve the same results.

Of course this is a violation of 240.8 in the real world.

Roger

But in order for current to flow, it would need the grounded conductor, so in effect you would have this:

parallelbreakers6.jpg
 
480sparky said:
But in order for current to flow, it would need the grounded conductor, so in effect you would have this:


parallelbreakers6.jpg

Now your catching on!

I think we are getting somewhere now. :)

The problem is you're still trying to look at the load as being two.

Roger
 
Last edited:
roger said:
Yes it would.

Think of taking a 40 amp single pole breaker and running two equal #12 conductors to a single 40 amp heating element, if you were to put an ammeter on the conductors one at a time they would be carrying 1/2 the load current which would be 20 amps.

Feeding two individual conductors with 20 amp breakers on the same leg or phase would achieve the same results.

Of course this is a violation of 240.8 in the real world.

Roger

By what you're saying here, this is what you have:

parallelbreakers7.jpg

No current can flow because there is no circuit.
 
roger said:
Why? In this exercise the unit is is 120 volt and would fry on a higher voltage.

Roger

That is my point about not being field friendly. Guy comes in and finds only two spaces open (pole position 1 and 3).Turns it on and smoke.Or am i missing the whole thing. He should be using a 40 amp single pole but only has two single 20's on the truck.
 
480sparky said:
By what you're saying here, this is what you have:

parallelbreakers7.jpg

No current can flow because there is no circuit.

Why did you get rid of the grounded conductor? You have just lost all that you had learned.
icon10.gif


Roger
 
RUWired said:
That is my point about not being field friendly. Guy comes in and finds only two spaces open (pole position 1 and 3).Turns it on and smoke.Or am i missing the whole thing. He should be using a 40 amp single pole but only has two single 20's on the truck.

Rick, if the circuit is fed from the same leg or phase it will never be in jeopardy of a higher voltage.

Roger
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top