What do you look like . . . again?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Thats me on the right, the fat bald one. And this is the biggest crappie I ever caught.
 
Last edited:
A punk pirate, and a ladybug..... :D

HPIM0859.jpg



HPIM0860.jpg



I do enjoy Halloween, but not as much as them.... :wink:
 
My goth witch is 16, and she's pretty much like that every day.

Thankfully they grow out of that stage by 17 1/2 or 18. Been there, done that, got the tee shirt to prove it. :smile:
 
This is proof that the internet makes confrontation easier. I never would have disagreed with you in person so forcefully about that meggar thing a while back. You're bigger than me....Sir.
Don't let that photo fool you; he's only 5'6". :grin:
 
Ross in his natural habitat

I hate to point it out, but it's not Y'=Y(N-1)*x/N, but Y'=Y(N?-1)*x/N. This will bring the singularity in line with the proper branching of the set. Unless, of course, you're dealing with the reverse intolerances of the time-delayed initial conditions. Naturally, all this is a moot point at 1x10EE-16 sec.

Keep in mind, quantum physics really isn't my strong point. :D
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top