210.8(F) GFCI Protection

Status
Not open for further replies.

kwired

Electron manager
Location
NE Nebraska
I am thinking about the following as PIs for the 2026.
Outlet:
A point where the branch circuit conductors connect to, or will be connected to, a receptacle(s), fixture whip conductors, or utilization equipment

Lighting Outlet.
A point where the branch circuit conductors connect to, or will be connected to a lampholder, luminaire, or fixture whip conductors.

Receptacle Outlet.
A point where the branch circuit conductors are connected to a receptacle(s).
Maybe a little redundant? How about something like:

Outlet:
A point where the branch circuit conductors connect to, or will be connected to, a receptacle(s), fixture whip conductors, a lamp holder, luminaire or utilization equipment.
 

wwhitney

Senior Member
Location
Berkeley, CA
Occupation
Retired
I am thinking about the following as PIs for the 2026.
The term "whip" is not used anywhere else in the NEC, so I'm not sure introducing a new term is a good idea. Is the intent of that language only to cover conductors supplied with the utilization equipment, or do you intend to cover some field installed whips?

It would be more compact to use your definition of "outlet" within the second two definitions. I.e.:

Lighting outlet. An outlet for connection to a lampholder, luminaire, or fixture whip conductors.
Receptacle outlet. An outlet at which a receptacle is installed.

Cheers, Wayne
 

don_resqcapt19

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Illinois
Occupation
retired electrician
Maybe a little redundant? How about something like:

Outlet:
A point where the branch circuit conductors connect to, or will be connected to, a receptacle(s), fixture whip conductors, a lamp holder, luminaire or utilization equipment.
Because we already have all 3 definitions in the code, and would not expect that the CMP would want to combine them into one rule.
 

don_resqcapt19

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Illinois
Occupation
retired electrician
The term "whip" is not used anywhere else in the NEC, so I'm not sure introducing a new term is a good idea. Is the intent of that language only to cover conductors supplied with the utilization equipment, or do you intend to cover some field installed whips?

....

Cheers, Wayne
My concern is covering the connection to a luminaire with a factory installed whip. It would my my opinion, that for a factor installed whip, the outlet point is the connection between the branch circuit conductors and the conductors in the whip. Might be a better way to cover that, but not sure.

Trying to prevent the possibility that seems to permit code "experts" to say equipment can be operated without a connection to an outlet. There is a recognized author and instructor that is teaching what was said in this thread...that is 210.8(F) does not apply to hard wired AC equipment because there is no outlet.
 

Bill Snyder

NEC expert
Location
Denver, Co
Occupation
Electrical Foreman
Any electrical equipment that works and is not supplied by batteries is connected to an outlet. If it is not connected to an outlet, there is no possible way to supply power to the equipment.
If CMP 12 wanted to address this, they could put a rule in 625 that says that 210.8(F) does not apply to EVSE, as they can modify the rule in Article 210. They choose not to put such a rule in 625, so 210.8(F) applies to hard wired EVSE equipment installed at an outside location at a dwelling unit.
Go on Google and find a picture of a hardwired outlet they don't have one this interpretation has been fabricated by CMP-2 and lacks technical merit.
 

wwhitney

Senior Member
Location
Berkeley, CA
Occupation
Retired
My concern is covering the connection to a luminaire with a factory installed whip. It would my my opinion, that for a factor installed whip, the outlet point is the connection between the branch circuit conductors and the conductors in the whip. Might be a better way to cover that, but not sure.
How about:

Outlet:
A point where the branch circuit conductors connect to, or will be connected to, a receptacle(s) or the terminals or conductors provided with utilization equipment.

Or something like that.

Cheers, Wayne
 

Rjryan

Member
Location
Trophy Club, Texas
Occupation
Master Electrician
There is alot of confusion concerning NEC's changes with 210.8(F) and HVAC installations. I understand that the AC disconnect is now considered an outlet and it needs GFCI protection. What I'm hoping someone can clarify is does that mean a GFCI breaker needs to be installed in the AC disconnect feeding the HVAC equipment? - OR- Does it mean the breaker feeding the AC disconnect back at the panel needs to be a GFCI breaker? - OR - Have I misunderstood this altogether?

Thank you,
Fred Kreusch
ABLE Power Products
NEC 210.8(F)
Exception No.2 GFCI protection shall not be required for listed HVAC equipment. This exception shall expire September 1, 2026.
 

Bill Snyder

NEC expert
Location
Denver, Co
Occupation
Electrical Foreman
try reading the definition of outlet and explain how the equipment can work without an outlet.
I read the definition of individual branch circuit and there is no mention of an outlet so that tells me it can be either connected to an outlet or directly terminated to utilization equipment.
 

Bill Snyder

NEC expert
Location
Denver, Co
Occupation
Electrical Foreman
NEC 210.8(F)
Exception No.2 GFCI protection shall not be required for listed HVAC equipment. This exception shall expire September 1, 2026.
The list got longer with the standards council rejection of the CMP-2 TIAs and added all units with compatibility issues.
 

Bill Snyder

NEC expert
Location
Denver, Co
Occupation
Electrical Foreman
You use google as a "NEC handbook"?

It can be useful search tool but you still need to take what you find or do not find and interpret what it might mean for yourself.
I say there is no appliance outlet
 

Attachments

  • 306710378_681212529509113_7760978535625579802_n.png
    306710378_681212529509113_7760978535625579802_n.png
    472.6 KB · Views: 21
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top