T
T.M.Haja Sahib
Guest
A mwbc by definition has shared neutral.So if we try to use gfci receptacles in a mwbc,it will lead to nuisance tripping of gfci's.So my answer to' Can mwbc feed GFCI receptacles?' is no.
You mean it is possible without any modification to mwbc?And you would be 100% incorrect.
Next question please.
You mean it is possible without any modification to mwbc?
You mean it is possible without any modification to mwbc?
A GFCI receptacle only has one terminal for the line side energized conductor. Therefore, one can only connect ONE of the energized conductors of a MWBC to a GFCI at a time. The only neutral current returning from any load downstream of the GFCI will be the current that passes through the GFCI on the energized conductor, that is, unless there is a circuit fault of some sort.A mwbc by definition has shared neutral.So if we try to use gfci receptacles in a mwbc,it will lead to nuisance tripping of gfci's.So my answer to' Can mwbc feed GFCI receptacles?' is no.
Absolutely.
Done all the time by yours truly and 1000s of others often.
I can supply large numbers of GFCI receptacles from MWBCs without any problem or modifications.
Perhaps you should draw the circuit out and see if you can point to a reason why it would not work?
Heck I will even help you out, any of the receptacles in this crude drawing could be GFCIs. Or The breaker could be a GFCI breaker and protect all the receptacles from one point.
![]()
Bob's diagram shows a Junction Box where the MWBC is spliced to two wire branch circuit extensions.You mean it is possible without any modification to mwbc?
A GFCI receptacle only has one terminal for the line side energized conductor. Therefore, one can only connect ONE of the energized conductors of a MWBC to a GFCI at a time. The only neutral current returning from any load downstream of the GFCI will be the current that passes through the GFCI on the energized conductor, that is, unless there is a circuit fault of some sort.
QED.
The answer to the OP is YES.
No,sir.I am afraid you missed something.Consider a mwbc 120v/240v circuit feeding two gfci receptacles,each gfci wired to the outer hot conductors,but, per the definition of mwbc,with the neutral on the load side of one gfci connected to the line side of other gfci.If the gfci receptacle with line side connected neutral supplies any load,it would trip the other gfci due to neutral current flow through it.
Respectfully,No,sir.I am afraid you missed something.Consider a mwbc 120v/240v circuit feeding two gfci receptacles,each gfci wired to the outer hot conductors,but, per the definition of mwbc,with the neutral on the load side of one gfci connected to the line side of other gfci.If the gfci receptacle with line side connected neutral supplies any load,it would trip the other gfci due to neutral current flow through it.
Then it can not be mwbc, See 'the shared neutral' in the definition of mwbc.On the load side of the GFI receptacle, the N. conductor can no longer be shared with the rest of the MWBC unless your protection is coming from multi-pole GFI breaker, not being provided by a GFI receptacle.
This is your error,No,sir.I am afraid you missed something.Consider a mwbc 120v/240v circuit feeding two gfci receptacles,each gfci wired to the outer hot conductors,but, per the definition of mwbc,with the neutral on the load side of one gfci connected to the line side of other gfci.If the gfci receptacle with line side connected neutral supplies any load,it would trip the other gfci due to neutral current flow through it.
Then it can not be mwbc, See 'the shared neutral' in the definition of mwbc.
You are correct that the load side neutral is not shared.Then it can not be mwbc, See 'the shared neutral' in the definition of mwbc.
Then how can we say it is a mwbc,because separate neutral wires are taken to the line side of each gfci and separate neutral wires should be taken on the load sides also?This is your error,
The line side GFCI receptacle neutral terminal of each GFCI receptacle are BOTH connected to the MWBC neutral.
A mwbc by definition has shared neutral.So if we try to use gfci receptacles in a mwbc,it will lead to nuisance tripping of gfci's.So my answer to' Can mwbc feed GFCI receptacles?' is no.
That is not your OP question.Then how can we say it is a mwbc,because separate neutral wires are taken to the line side of each gfci and separate neutral wires should be taken on the load sides also?
It is a MWBC because that is what it was when it left the panel. What you do with the wires after they leave the panel will not change the character of the circuit. For example, when you get to the last outlet (i.e., furthest or most remote from the panel), all you will have is one hot conductor and one neutral (plus the EGC). You no longer have multiple hot conductors. If a person opened that outlet box and looked inside, they would only see these three wires, and think this was just a standard, single phase circuit. It is not, and the person would have to look further upstream to notice that multiple hot conductors shared a neutral when they left the panel, and continued to share the neutral up to the first junction box or outlet box they entered. Nothing that happens downstream from that point can change the fact that the circuit is a MWBC.Then it can not be mwbc, See 'the shared neutral' in the definition of mwbc.