charlietuna
Senior Member
Well put Rsolel,
And i think most here agree with your points. As i said, what upsets me the most is when the HI writes up a "none issue"! And you are right in evaluating that the cheapest inspector gets the job and probably knows the least! When the HI trade first began, i know certain realtors in my area would use the same HI, and the inspection fee was usually a set figure with a bonus incentive on the dollar value of the items he could find. To me it was just a method to beat the seller's price down. Many times we would be called to evaluate or price out these items for a seller. Too many times we would be following behind the same inspector and his report was like it was "rubber stamped". And many times we would find serious problems overlooked by the inspector, almost like they only look at those items which were mentioned in the HI classroom. Not many homebuyers could afford to call out individual trades to inspect a purchase, so maybe there is a place for these inspections?? But what did we do before HOME INSPECTORS"? This is why i consider them a waste of money. Nowdays, the realtor trys to sell the seller on having the house inspected by HI's prior to being placed on the market, saying it makes the house "more sellable" to prospective buyers! They even have a buyer's insurance policy the seller can purchase for the buyer?? Other than the installation of ground faults, i see no use for home inspections, and then consider that about 60% of ground faults don't work makes it sensless !
And i think most here agree with your points. As i said, what upsets me the most is when the HI writes up a "none issue"! And you are right in evaluating that the cheapest inspector gets the job and probably knows the least! When the HI trade first began, i know certain realtors in my area would use the same HI, and the inspection fee was usually a set figure with a bonus incentive on the dollar value of the items he could find. To me it was just a method to beat the seller's price down. Many times we would be called to evaluate or price out these items for a seller. Too many times we would be following behind the same inspector and his report was like it was "rubber stamped". And many times we would find serious problems overlooked by the inspector, almost like they only look at those items which were mentioned in the HI classroom. Not many homebuyers could afford to call out individual trades to inspect a purchase, so maybe there is a place for these inspections?? But what did we do before HOME INSPECTORS"? This is why i consider them a waste of money. Nowdays, the realtor trys to sell the seller on having the house inspected by HI's prior to being placed on the market, saying it makes the house "more sellable" to prospective buyers! They even have a buyer's insurance policy the seller can purchase for the buyer?? Other than the installation of ground faults, i see no use for home inspections, and then consider that about 60% of ground faults don't work makes it sensless !