mbrooke
Batteries Included
- Location
- United States
- Occupation
- Technician
Freudian slip?
No auto correct- as per usual. Changing Lose to Loose, enduring to endearing, concise to consist, ect.
Freudian slip?
faults are seldom bolted, usually arcing
wag that is one reason for 1/t cb's
btw I posted the cb curve if you know how to read it
ask any real electrician; most fires are hi Z faults, say 30 A on a 20, 10-20 min
175 x 0.6/600 = 175 ma
Dalziel 0.33 sec
your chart 0.75 sec
cb trip at 175, 8 x Ir or 800% 1 sec = dead
garage
2 pole plug, cracked/compromised insul and wet
wet floor
wet hands
20/1 or egc will do nothing
guess that is why the nec requires it
Correct- Technically sputtering based on paschens criteria for 120 volts- but you would still be correct by using UL's definition of emotion of light and volitization of electrodes.
I know how to read them- hence why a flag immediately went up seeing the instant trip threshold- looked at the box to the top left and the type of breaker at top.
0.75 seconds? My chart says 1 cycle at 60Hz or less than 0.02 seconds. Also 6 x 20= 120 amps at which magnetic trip begins.
https://download.schneider-electric...2.1080103655.1532924957-1088240790.1532924957
Correct, if I pick up a bare section of cord an EGC will do nothing. The IEC calls this direct contact and only a GFCI will protect me. Here I fully agree with you and this is the secondary reason
the 0.75 is the shock duration chart
the 1 sec is the cb trip
your cb chart is also 1 sec at 800%
correct, the range is 500 to 1250, mean 900 or so
as far as 'he only knows mines'
35 year career
29 in industry: data centers, comm, oil/gas, mil facilities, pharma/biotech, water/wasrewater, commercial
no residential other than large apts and public housing
mining 6 years, as complex, or more so, than almost anything else I've done
many industries use sgf and ngr
iirc gfci started out in order
bathrooms
kitchens
outdoors
garages
pools
all have decreased gf paths and increased shorting hazard, ie, water
never said mccb's are dangerous
they are primarily fire/equip/elec sys protections
they do afford some personnel protection (deenergise faulted ckts before they become a shock hazard)
they offer minimal protection to personnel DURING a fault
hence gfci = personnel protection
in a perfect 'cost no object' world you would have both set to appropriate levels
hey!!! I represent that! lol
I may be old, and terse (you try posting on an iphone )
but ornery and cranky?!? lol, frustrated for wasting time trying to explain it
ok, I come across as such at times, but really, no emotional content, no ill will
just being a smart @$$
not a fight
trying to show him a gfci provides protection solid grounding/bonding does not
NOT saying: eliminate egc's, mccb's are dangerous, etc
Ok, translates to 160 amps. At 175 the magnetic trip picks up.
wrong
top of curve is at 1 sec
but doesn't matter
at 60 A could be 100 sec
the mistake you repeatedly make is you think the egc is ALWAYS in the ckt when a person is shocked
it usually is not, the person is the fault path
or the person is in series with it
seldom parallel
obviously that reduces exposure, touch potential, but not current
but even with it in a large percentage of cases the victim dies or is injured
by your logic since all ckts have an egc there can never be shock injury
mine is it does little to provide personnel protection
hence gfci's in locations where shock is most likely
Is there a major difference between a lobster tank and an aquarium? There has to be a few million aquariums out there that don't have gfci protection and everybody is surviving and making it to work and school everyday.
If barefoot on a wood or carpeted floor it has no reason to trip a GFCI.There is a, what i'd coin 'urban legend' that's circulated for quite some time, of a spark who held both noodle & hot in each hand , load side gfci, and could not let go.
Perhaps he wore quality sneakers?
~RJ~
Are we headed for the longest thread in the Forum :?:lol:
Not even close- YET- we still have this contender :lol:
http://forums.mikeholt.com/showthread.php?t=192670
Does that one count?And that one is nowhere near as long as this one:
http://forums.mikeholt.com/showthread.php?t=151414
Does that one count?