A big box salesman exercises discretion and refuses to open the glass case to sell a nitwit customer a breaker. A breaker, that in this case was secured due to price, but would other wise be available in another brand or at another store. Obviously, the customer must have said something to the management, as the manager quizzes the salesman about the situation. Interestingly, the manager agrees with the salesman for his decision not to sell the breaker to the nitwit.
So in lays the paradox. I agree that in this instance, that the salesman was correct for not aiding and abetting the nitwit in his erroneous pursuit of a sure fire (pardon the pun) attempt at overloading improper wiring techniques.
However, I disagree with the precedent brought forth in this case, as I would not want any salesperson to prohibit any transaction that I would desire, based solely upon the merits of his understanding of the methods and material detailed in a short and semi formal conversation. If I asked for a 100 amp FPE to connect to #12s, what does it matter to him? (And what difference does it make anyway, seeing that it's a FPE? :grin: )
So, Mr. salesman, you did the right thing (IMO) this time. But don't get in my way when I want to spend my money at your store. I have my rights, you know?