steelersman
Senior Member
- Location
- Lake Ridge, VA
PLastic Keyless, you need to upgrade your clients
nothing wrong with a plastic keyless. In fact I think they hold up better than porcelain ones as sometimes they shatter.
PLastic Keyless, you need to upgrade your clients
I disagree entirely with your interpretation of 314.3.
314.3 is not in Part III Construction Specifications, it is in Part I Scope and General. The significance being is if I as the installer provide bonding between all used entries I have meet the requirements.
If I have one MC entry I have no bonding to do, if I have more than one MC or EMT entry I would have to provide bonding between them, that would easily be accomplished with bonding bushings and a jumper.
NEC 314.3 does not require a specific box, it requires bonding.
You can disagree all you like, that is what this forum is about. We need to read what is written.
right on pete, you tell 'em.And after reading what was just written, I would still install an MC cable in a plastic box that has a 1/2 k.o. All I have to do is provide the required bonding.
right on pete, you tell 'em.
agreed.As I said before, and will say again, common sense is all you need here.
As I said before, and will say again, common sense is all you need here.
Common sense is to use a steel box with MC.
no actually common sense says use plastic when you can as it doesn't rust. using a metal box is just the norm, but not common sense. It's just what YOU'RE used to.Common sense is to use a steel box with MC.
Find one that is listed for a fire rating and then I'll use it. In the meantime, when the Arlington "One Box" is the only one that is listed for that application, and it has a 1/2" KO in it, guess what? I'm installing MC cable into it.
Yes I see this done everywhere silly me. :roll:no actually common sense says use plastic when you can as it doesn't rust. using a metal box is just the norm, but not common sense. It's just what YOU'RE used to.
You can disagree all you like, that is what this forum is about. We need to read what is written.
4. Both exceptions mention INTEGRAL BONDING MEANS.
Integral means the bonding means will be part of the box, not the fittings.
Common sense is to use a steel box with MC.
So Now you want to go by listings??
Ul 514b was 1006 bucks to buy online so I can wait till monday.Do boxes have listings that say what types of wiring methods can and can't be used with them? I know that a plastic nail-on box does. A PVC junction box? Maybe it does. Regardless, if I bond the metallic raceways or wiring methods then I am code compliant.
Ul 514b was 1006 bucks to buy online so I can wait till monday.
Let's say I have an MC cable stubbed outside, and my purpose is to transition that cable to an underground run of PVC conduit.
If I choose the plastic, because it goes nicely with the PVC conduit, I make all my own holes, and then I install the MC cable into it. I throw a bonding bushing on the cable connector and connect it to the EGC that is present in the MC cable. Done, end of story.
if you only have 1 mc cable coming into that plastic box then I don't see why you would need a bond bushing as it would be bonded by the connector at the panel.
Exactly, or the 4-square above the ceiling that it dropped down out of. There's no special requirement that the MC armor be bonded at both ends. One or the other will do the trick. If a knockout is about 7/8" round, I don't care what kind of box it is, it's getting a connector put in it.if you only have 1 mc cable coming into that plastic box then I don't see why you would need a bond bushing as it would be bonded by the connector at the panel.
Sure, but that's sort of a special case. Well, maybe not so special going forward... that stuff is making inroads fast.Lets say it was MCap, he would need the bond to continue the EGC.