mdshunk
Senior Member
- Location
- Right here.
Not so sure I'd explode. I might just chuckle to myself and wonder why. :roll:splinetto said:You other guys would explode if you knew how many staples I use ....
Not so sure I'd explode. I might just chuckle to myself and wonder why. :roll:splinetto said:You other guys would explode if you knew how many staples I use ....
splinetto said:Let me guess you only put one staple at the box ..
If you run Nm any which way when it will be covered up why then do run it different when it will be exposed..... Is it because people will see it then and you want it to look neater???? Neat is not dependent on whether you can see it or not..mdshunk said:Exposed work, now that's a different story. I try to run exposed NM just like I might run EMT.
Exactly right. Doing otherwise is wasteful, in my opinion. There is no benefit in making concealed work into art work.splinetto said:If you run Nm any which way when it will be covered up why then do run it different when it will be exposed..... Is it because people will see it then and you want it to look neater????
I would describe it as compliant.splinetto said:If your exposed work is neat how would you describe all the other work??
Then why isnt compliant OK for exposed work??mdshunk said:I would describe it as compliant.
It is. I like to exceed the minimum requirements on the exposed work, much as you exceed the minimum requirements on all your work. Nothing wrong with either approach.splinetto said:Then why isnt compliant OK for exposed work??
I dont see my work as exceeding min req just meeting code.... Im going to ask my insp if he would fail my house if I pulled 3 wires in one hole, pulled wires diaginal, drilled holes un even and only used one staple at every box...Ill let you know what he says....mdshunk said:It is. I like to exceed the minimum requirements on the exposed work, much as you exceed the minimum requirements on all your work. Nothing wrong with either approach.
augie47 said:could you come to my area of rual TN and work for a while. I've asked, and I think 1 out of 10 electricans I see on a given day own a code book and less than that carry one, at least a current copy.
the standard procedure here is to wire it like I always have or like my cousin taught me. If I get a red tag, I will change methods to adapt until the next red tag.
sad sometimes
commercial job today...parallel feeders, EGC only in one conduit, conduit fill 24 #12s, 20 amp circuits--but they did pull the neutrals in a seperate conduit to avoid conduit over-fill, no disconnects on refrigeration equipment, no gfci's in kitchen, etc. and this is the 4th one of these KFC's they have wired...
So far, nobody has indicated that would be okay by them. And, I should add, I'm sure you can find an inspector saying that he'd fail just about anything. There are educated one's and one's who only pass what they're used to seeing.splinetto said:...and only used one staple at every box.
Where is this legal or enforced?? you can sure tell which guys are paying for the wire on this thread. LMAO.LawnGuyLandSparky said:"Journeyman electricians shall correct defective workmanship on their own time during regular working hours."
Simply put, when this rule is (rarely needed to be) enforced, the electrician first re-do's the work, is paid for the hours needed for the re-do, the hours spent messing up are deducted, and the layoff check is already in the foreman's hand before the whole process begins.
quogueelectric said:Where is this legal or enforced?? you can sure tell which guys are paying for the wire on this thread. LMAO.
splinetto said:I put 2 staples at every box, one at the top plate, and one in the middle...when im going down to a switch... the wire has to stay flat of course..
quogueelectric said:Where is this legal or enforced?? you can sure tell which guys are paying for the wire on this thread. LMAO.