mivey
Senior Member
Me neither, as it was just my opinion. I guess a little study time is in order.I would think so too. But I am not certain that the code actually says that.
Me neither, as it was just my opinion. I guess a little study time is in order.I would think so too. But I am not certain that the code actually says that.
Electrically speaking, I don't see it as a problem either. I think charlie is after what the code actually says, whether or not it makes sense.If this circuit ends up fused at 15 amps then there is no problem with ground or other conductors.
If it is fused at 15 amps and uses #12 ungrounded conductors, there might be a problem with #14 EGC. Perhaps I should move all comments related to this side-issue to their own thread. Or maybe we can all just let it go, and return to the original discussion.If this circuit ends up fused at 15 amps then there is no problem with ground or other conductors.
I'd rather see you move it than let it go. It is interesting.If it is fused at 15 amps and uses #12 ungrounded conductors, there might be a problem with #14 EGC. Perhaps I should move all comments related to this side-issue to their own thread. Or maybe we can all just let it go, and return to the original discussion.
cds9044, curious, was the permit issued with a contractors license number or as "homeowner" ?
I ask because at one time 14 was allowed in TN as a switchleg and a great number or "homeowners" still make that mistake. He might well have been influenced by the way the permit was issued.
Good point. I did take this out as a homeowner and not on my contractor's license. I still plan on calling in the morning and plead my case. We'll see what happens.
We can always use inspectors on the forum.
I say we can, and it is.Can we say with certainty that when you switch to the smaller wire, you no longer need the biggie-sized EGC? Is this adequately covered by the wording of 250.122(B): "Where ungrounded conductors are increased. . . "?
I say we can, and it is.
When someone runs, for example, #12 to a box, goes to #6 for a long run, and goes back to #12 at the load end, must the EGC be #6 from panel to load?
Nay, I say! Nay!
Besides, if this was cable, where would you find #14 NM with a #12 EGC?
That's when you'd use PVC and conductors instead of cable. ~ Capt. O.If I want to run 6/3 UF to a far away post light with a GFCI receptacle on it (Black constant, Red Switched) I have an issue with the EGC.
That's when you'd use PVC and conductors instead of cable. ~ Capt. O.
Yes, that was a signature. I shoulda used quotes.... you are Capt. O ...
Can you go over the inspector's head?Talked to inspector this morning. He said it didn't matter if I was going to use 15 amp breaker or not and that you can't mix #14 and #12 in a circuit......no code reference cited.
He is wrong. You can do that.He said it didn't matter if I was going to use 15 amp breaker or not and that you can't mix #14 and #12 in a circuit.
The only applicable code requirement is 240.4. You have to protect all conductors at their ampacity....no code reference cited.
Good point. I did take this out as a homeowner and not on my contractor's license. I still plan on calling in the morning and plead my case. We'll see what happens.
Talked to inspector this morning. He said it didn't matter if I was going to use 15 amp breaker or not and that you can't mix #14 and #12 in a circuit......no code reference cited.
Now comes the fun part. You know you are right and can probably eventually get it approved but is it worth the trouble?
You're exactly right. Do I want to go through the trouble and get it passed only to have him give me a hard time on the final? Of course, if I install everything correctly on the final he shouldn't find anything to fail me on.......or maybe he will?
You're exactly right. Do I want to go through the trouble and get it passed only to have him give me a hard time on the final? Of course, if I install everything correctly on the final he shouldn't find anything to fail me on.......or maybe he will?