Well, when I first presented the example, it was not my intent to discuss the power factor. It was only to show that a pulse could have the same RMS value as a sinusoidal. And one thing lead to another... :blink:170620-0932 EDT
Smart $:
This is true. But you also have to define values, the load circuit, how the pulse width varies with position, and how pulse amplitude changes with position.
We assume you are still using a voltage sine wave of 1.414 peaks, Vrms = 1 V. Since the current is constant in amplitude its Irms = 1 A. Thus, Vrms*Irms = 1.
However, average power is 1 (current) * 1.414 (peak voltage) * 0.636 (average value of a 1/2 cycle of a sine wave) = 0.899 . Thus, the power factor is about 0.9, not 1.
With a sine wave voltage source the load current must be a sine wave if the power factor is to be 1. In other words the load must be a continuously connecter resistor.
You are correct (as was GD earlier). I had not considered the power waveform for a long pulse to be a half-sine ripple.
Hmmm... seems that we now have a dispute over what was being disputed. :rant:I don't think that is in dispute. But the power factor of a load on a DC supply with a large output capacitor does not reflect back thru the DC supply to be the power factor at the input to the DC supply. The power factor at the input to a DC supply is a function of the design of the power supply, and the load power (not factor) on the DC supply.
jk :lol: