NO, GFCI's only look downstream.
My point
if first cb is not gf no protection if the cable faults in water
NO, GFCI's only look downstream.
A class A GFCI has the same trip requirements regardless of breaker or receptacle.
I thought that 6ma was 6ma at every point in the series circuit.
More of a concern to me is that a fault will trip either one or both, making resetting more frustrating.
How long of a run between the two GFCI's?
The longer the run the more capacitive leakage you may have causing undesired tripping.
If you want "double protection" that is fine but don't put one of them at the beginning of a long run.
What you call a long run . at what length would capacitive leakage become a problem on #10 uf/wg on a gfci?
Is this something that changed with the last revision on GFCI standards?Sort of. Only thing they really care about is that current that goes out comes back on another monitored conductor, then there is also a signal injected that allows them to instantly trip on a neutral to ground fault even if no load current is otherwise present.
This is a feature of second generation receptacle GFCIs. Not sure what the history or current situation is on breaker type GFCIs.Is this something that changed with the last revision on GFCI standards?
I ask because that definitely didn't used to be the case: That was a classic symptom of a NG fault if the GFCI didnt trip until something was plugged in.
They have been that way for at least 25-30 years.Is this something that changed with the last revision on GFCI standards?
I ask because that definitely didn't used to be the case: That was a classic symptom of a NG fault if the GFCI didnt trip until something was plugged in.
They have been that way for at least 25-30 years.
They were detecting N-G faults and tripping with no other load present when I first started in this trade, that was about 28 years ago.I think the neutral detection feature is much more recent than that.
They were detecting N-G faults and tripping with no other load present when I first started in this trade, that was about 28 years ago.
It is only been in the past 10-12 years that the GFCI could detect a neutral to ground fault without a load.I do not believe so, I am fairly certain that has been in the last 10 years.
Why spend some more when those loads are on the same feed? Knowing how to wire things is important. Do it like this:
View attachment 15104
This drawing is no different than the instructions included with the GFCI.
And I think I see where iwire was coming from about commercial kitchens not wanting this- instead wanting to be able physically see the gfci in the kitchen. The gfci being right there next to the equipment ensures compliance and makes it easier to reset instead of going to breaker tucked away in a panel.
It is only been in the past 10-12 years that the GFCI could detect a neutral to ground fault without a load.
All of the listed GFCIs being manufactured now are of the "self-testing" type. They automatically test themselves and either lock out the power or give an audible and/or visual indication of the failure.
Curt, that was always true when there was a load on the circuit.
Now they trip load or no load
I never saw that until they changed UL 943 to require neutral ground fault protection.Bob, old GFCI's would trip without any additional load on the circuit. For as long as I remember I have been able to trip a GFCI by touching the load neutral to ground.
Bob, old GFCI's would trip without any additional load on the circuit. For as long as I remember I have been able to trip a GFCI by touching the load neutral to ground.