- Location
- Massachusetts
I am not seeing your point smart.
Ain't that the truth.Minuteman said:The reason given for discharging an employee, and the actual reason, can be entirely different.
Of course you wouldn't, given your disposition.iwire said:I am not seeing your point smart.
Smart $ said:Of course you wouldn't, given your disposition.
Your attitude toward any comment I make is that it is sheer conjecture, so I leave you to determine the point yourself.
Cigarettes contain and emit toxic chemicals. Additionally, cigarettes have a record of being contaminated by a poisonous additive, coumarin, used for rat poison. Wherefore, by definition, cigarette emissions are "ultrahazardous" and so are illegal everywhere, including on-the-job.
As smoking (spewing poisons, garbage, onto others) is always unlawful, the...
OK, let me clue you in a little bit...iwire said:My disposition is I let the coworkers smoke when I can, if it upsets the customer or is against the customers rules then I don't.
I just thought your would be able to explain your post with the OSHA references because at it stands it makes no sense.
Smart $ said:but contractors, rather than develop a true, full-fledged safety program feel placing blanket signs will "CYA".
This may, and most likely will be satisfactory for any OSHA rep that is a smoke-free workplace advocate, but in truth is fineable because the signs at not placed at or in the vicinity of the aforementioned operations..
Ditto!georgestolz said:Wow, Tom, you think you could have found a more slightly biased source?
Smart $ said:Standing outside the facility where I was previously permitted to smoke, I look up at the smoke stack pouring out tons of pollutants and wonder what cloud the people that voted for the ban where on.
Smart $ said:There is one item which I would like to stress in the above listing, and that is "Lack of Concentration". This puts the smoker at a higher risk of being involved in or causing an accident. Is this worth not letting the smoker take a few minutes to light up? I was a victim of my own lack of concentration, but didn't realize it until afterwards when I did the research!
Smart $ said:There is one item which I would like to stress in the above listing, and that is "Lack of Concentration". This puts the smoker at a higher risk of being involved in or causing an accident. Is this worth not letting the smoker take a few minutes to light up? I was a victim of my own lack of concentration, but didn't realize it until afterwards when I did the research!
Are you trying to say smokers do not contribute anything [other than smoke] to our society? Ha!iwire said:So the basic message is because the power plant pollutes to provide electricity for the masses that means I have to breath smokers pollution?
The difference I see is this.
A power plant is necessary for our society.
Matter of opinion. Unfortunately for myself and other smokers, we are of the minority and will therefore lose this battle, and some of our individual rights in the process.iwire said:Your having a butt at work is not.
Not true... the beyond listening to anyone part, that is. I'll listen to anyone that talks truthfully with an open mind, provided I am afforded the same. You may well be guilty of your own accusation.iwire said:I will back off as I can tell you are very passionate about this and are well beyond listing to anyone.
Not me! If I am in your presence, I would respectfully remove myself from your presence to satisfy both our desires. But allow me the dignity of doing so. I smoke in my own home, but because other non-smokers are present, I do so in the bathroom with the exhaust fan running, or under the range hood with [outside] exhaust fan running, or outside. I do this out of courtesy for anyone. Why am I not afforded the same courtesy?iwire said:I don't really care much one way or the other, they are hundreds of toxins I am exposed to every day. What gets me is the smokers attitude that seems to be that they have a right to blow smoke my way.
This I believe, too! Sad, sad days ahead for individual rights.iwire said:The fact is for better or worse smoking will be confined more and more...
Smart $ said:Are you trying to say smokers do not contribute anything [other than smoke] to our society? Ha!
iwire said:Your having a butt at work is not.
Matter of opinion.
You may well be guilty of your own accusation.
Not me! If I am in your presence, I would respectfully remove myself from your presence to satisfy both our desires. But allow me the dignity of doing so. I smoke in my own home, but because other non-smokers are present, I do so in the bathroom with the exhaust fan running, or under the range hood with [outside] exhaust fan running, or outside. I do this out of courtesy for anyone. Why am I not afforded the same courtesy?
This I believe, too! Sad, sad days ahead for individual rights.
They may in court if they caused it.roger said:And unfortunately for the smoker this a good reason for his/her termination if it is noticeable.
Whatever the reason for "Lack of Concentration" is, an employer doesn't have to put up with it.
Roger
Smart $ said:They may in court if they caused it.