Nope.Sounds like a bad design from the start, they must have loaded the circuits to the upper end to actually cause an overload on the neutral.
It was cumulative third harmonic. The third from all three phases is in phase.
Nope.Sounds like a bad design from the start, they must have loaded the circuits to the upper end to actually cause an overload on the neutral.
B phase was open-circuited in your scenario. The only thing left were loads connected from phase A to the ungrounded conductor. That my friend is a two-wire circuit when you subsequently want to talk about the load currents.Incorrect. I specifically mentioned A phase, B phase and a neutral.
Not really.B phase was open-circuited in your scenario.
All that is fine. There are scenarios where the ungrounded conductor may carry all the load, even in residential (like an out-building or shop for example).TBH, I don't know whether the regs (BS 7671) permit it.
Normally, we use 4-core (3-ph + neutral SWA). All cores are the same size so the question doesn't arise.
And there are cases where a higher rated neutral is required.
That luxury hotel, the Burj al Arab is a case in point. The company I worked for put in 3 MW of controlled lighting, all single phase, and there were lots of other single phase non-linear loads.
This resulted in a high third harmonic component and that all flows in the neutral of a three phase system. And it overloaded the neutral even though it was the same rating as the phase conductors.
It was a different division of the company, mine was industrial rather than commercial, but I got asked to look at the issue. After the event.
Sketch it out. With no B-phase loads, the B-phase loop is an open circuit.Not really.
Unloaded with the loads turned off/unplugged.
They could. And if they did it still would not require a full-size service neutral in the OP's residential scenario.How would you know that a consumer wouldn't/couldn't do that?
Might I gently suggest you read what the op stated at the start of this thread?But the OP had a residential dwelling scenario where he had dispersed the loads between the two busses. Plenty of 240 volt loads in the sizing calcs. Plenty of diversity. No need for a full-size neutral.
Nope.
It was cumulative third harmonic. The third from all three phases is in phase.
That's simply incorrect when you have non-linear loads on a three phase system.If the circuits themselves are are not maxed out current in the neutral is not going to exceed the rating of the neutral. Pretty straight forward.
Sounds like a bad design from the start, they must have loaded the circuits to the upper end to actually cause an overload on the neutral.
Oh surprise, we do know about non-linear loads here too and almost 100% of the info suggesting overloaded neutrals are a concern are coming from those with a stake in selling conductors.
For some time in the 80s and 90s we were running a lot of what were called 'super neutrals' in many cases the engineers had us run two neutrals to every panel. So a 200 amp panel would have at least a 400 amp neutral.
A better solution seems to be just not maxing out the circuits when dealing with non-linear loads.
The installations of super neutrals seems to have subsided but there is at least one area (and perhaps more) where the NEC requires an up sized neutral and that is for stage dimming equipment.
I suspect the requirement has as much to do with the non-linear loads as it does with the likelihood of the workers overloading the circuits.
That's simply incorrect when you have non-linear loads on a three phase system.
The OP was talking about service residential. I know what that is here in the US as I have been working with that for about 40 years.Might I gently suggest you read what the op stated at the start of this thread?
I am saying otherwise.Actually I don't believe it is.
If each underground conductor is less loaded the current in the neutral will be less.
Are you saying otherwise?
I am saying otherwise.
It was a problem at the Burj al Arab.
Not a theoretical problem. An actual real life problem. It happened.
I flew out there to investigate, take measurements, and come up with a solution.
What caused this to happen? Operator error? Design?
This is anything 'but' a single family residence.
I am saying otherwise.
It was a problem at the Burj al Arab.
Not a theoretical problem. An actual real life problem. It happened.
I flew out there to investigate, take measurements, and come up with a solution.
But still an application where the NEC could allow a reduced neutral. I know the OP asked about resi, but IMHO I see no harm in extending the theory to 3 phase.
The third harmonic content from each phase in a three phase system adds in the neutral. That's what happened.You are not making any sense here.
My statement was that if you reduce branch circuit current the neutral current will decrease.
You say that is false, please elaborate.
I have reduced it to the absolute minimum when we have no neutral loads. A 4/0 AL could have a #2 AL neutral.
I have upgraded services on some of those when they added AC.Schools back in the day had very limited HVAC because school would be out for the summer, and oil fired boilers used in the winter. There used to be some elementary schools that were fed by nothing more than a 50kva pole pig.
Same here, but most of those same schools now have AC in at least portions of the buildings, though most are seeing AC nearly everywhere.All the schools I attended where I grew up were built prior to 1970 and had no a/c whatsoever.
The small school districts around here share a school nurse. They only are there long enough to perform some basic physical exams once a year on each student, and the room they use for that is vacant most of the time otherwise. If a child gets sick or injured during school a teacher or other staff may stay with that child until parent arrives to pick them up, unless it is something serious enough then an ambulance may be called, and parent is directed to meet them at hospital. Many small schools do have someone that is a volunteer EMT on their staff, not that they seek them out, it just happens that way in small towns.Id argue that still holds true outside of the nurse's office.
Same here. I imagine we both have had three phase systems at grain storage facilities that maybe are supplied with 400, 600, 800 or even higher amp service or feeders, the bulk of the load being straight three phase motor loads. Line to neutral loads may not even be 5% of the service or feeder capacity even if they were all connected to the same leg. 1/0 neutrals are used because you can not parallel anything smaller then that though the calculated neutral load may only be 30 -50 amps max.I have reduced it to the absolute minimum when we have no neutral loads. A 4/0 AL could have a #2 AL neutral.
